The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


If Great Was Easy, We’d All Be Doing It …

One of the scariest, awesome things is starting a new project.

Especially a new project where you are given the freedom to take things to new places.

Scary, because there’s always the risk. you might fuck it up.

Awesome, because you can – in theory – go wherever the hell you like.

I love these moments.

I love exploring all the possibilities and then seeing where everyone’s energy is at.

I love the drama, the challenge, the breakthroughs and the crafting.

But most of all, I love the creation.

Seeing something come to life that wasn’t there before.

But to get to a place that excites rather than appeases, is emotionally draining and stimulating.

The process – if that is what you want to call it – is one that tests you more than tests the idea you’re developing.

And frankly we don’t talk about that enough.

Instead, we celebrate precision, perfection, optimization and logic.

And while there may well be elements of all that in all we do, they sure-as-shit don’t happen at the beginning of the process … and if you think they do, then you’re either kidding yourself or you haven’t tried hard enough.

But what’s scary is a lot of the way the industry is structuring themselves is to kid themselves or not try hard enough.

Too many people running our industry are people not from our industry – so they don’t understand how it works.

They see the rabbit holes we need to go down as a waste of time.

A costly exercise in the delivery of our ‘product’.

And while I appreciate you can take too long on things, you can also take too little time …

But that’s where we’re heading … where effectiveness is defined and determined by ‘delivery timelines’ or ‘fitting in’ to pre-determined definitions rather than trying to do something new … something different … something better.

Which is why it’s so funny so many brand and management consultancies talk about ‘brand transformation’ … because you can’t transform if you stick to predefined and predetermined rules, processes and logic. But then – as Lee Hill once told me – they’re not really transforming anyone or anything. What many are really doing is helping old and slow companies catch up with what everyone else in their category has been doing for an age. It means the consultancy can profit from articulating the learnings from the more progressive companies – rather than develop new possibilities and processes of their own – and wrap it up in expensive language that benefits both parties.

Or said another way … ‘catching up’ is sold as innovation and ‘duplication’ is sold as expertise.

OK, I’m being a little harsh there, but the point is … anyone who says creativity and progress can be delivered via a consistent, precise and stable process is either lying to themselves or lying to you. So don’t see the rollercoaster of the creative process as a cost, see it as people who want to make sure they do something really special for you.

Comments Off on If Great Was Easy, We’d All Be Doing It …


Why Alexa Has Destroyed Brand Building, Agency Partnerships, Audience Understanding And Creativity …

I know, that’s quite the title isn’t it.

Some would even say it’s ‘clickbait’.

Well, while I readily admit it’s slightly exaggerated, hang in there …

So years ago, Jill rang me to tell me she’d discovered Otis – who was about 4 years old back then – had made a shopping list of things he wanted to order on Amazon through Alexa.

Loads of stuff.

Fortunately for us, this included a range of items even Amazon can’t source.

Stuff such as: Eyeballs … Polar Bears … “Poo Poos” … and countless other weird shit his mind decided would be fun to own.

Putting aside the fact this proved he was most definitely my son, hearing his little voice recite all the things that were on his ‘ownership bucket list’ was wonderful, which is why we have never deleted it.

Not just so we can forever relive his childhood curiosity, but because it will be brilliant to play it when he has his 21st birthday – hahaha.

I say this because I recently read another evil genius use – or should I say, abuse – of Alexa.

This.

Why the hell had I never thought of doing this before?

On the positive, it has shown how mature I have become over the years. On the negative, it has highlighted how I am a groupie for mischief because you can be sure-as-hell I will be finding ways to do this to people from here on in. No wonder the guys at Q-Prime called me ‘immune to maturity’.

And while you may shake your head and call me a ‘sad bastard’ for wanting to do this, think of it as an act of revenge against the tech-bro boys.

Because as much as Alexa may have many uses and benefits … it has also fucked humanity. Teaching us to expect instant gratification for whatever we want, whenever we want it.

No moment for pause.
No time for consideration.
No appreciation of nuance.

Where the only thing that matters – and you are judged on – is the speed of the response.

It’s probably why so many brands love influencers.
Not simply because of their audience.
Not simply because of their popularity.
But because they will say EXACTLY what they want … without challenge, opinion or rearticulation.

I don’t blame the influencer for this, because not only are they making bank out of it, why should they give a shit … for them, the relationship is purely transactional and what they’re selling is access, not authenticity.

But I tell you who should care …

Clients.

But in these days where the main topic of conversation seems to be about ‘shouting at scale’ – read: believing media is way more important than working with people who know what to say and how to say it – is it any surprise that despite spending over US$1 TRILLION dollars on advertising last year, the industry feels like one homogenous, barren contrived-as-fuck blob?

Or as a client of mine recently said, “we’re past the brand building age and now in the brand shrinking era”.

I get instant answers are convenient.
I appreciate having people push back on you can be a pain.
But we need to get back to normalizing the value of objectivity.

Because the point of it is not to frustrate, but to stop you shouting into an echo chamber and building something that people helps people become something.

__________________________________________________________________

Finally – as if it being Friday wasn’t good enough – I am away again for 11 days.

ELEVEN!!!

However it’s not all good news because if you’re in Perth, Western Australia … then Paris, France … then Beijing, China … I’m going to be in your hood so watch out.

Actually, it’s even worse for the people in Perth because I’m going to be shouting swearwords at the brilliant State Of Social conference.

That’s right, the wonderful, generous, kind idiots have invited me again … which means some people just never learn from their mistakes.

So have a good weekend/week. Unless you’re in Perth, Paris or Beijing.

See you around the 3rd Sept.

Comments Off on Why Alexa Has Destroyed Brand Building, Agency Partnerships, Audience Understanding And Creativity …


Why Companies Should Be Grateful For Emotional Employees Rather Than Regular Robots …

Over the years I’ve written a lot about companies viewing ‘emotional people’ as problems.

Viewing them as too passionate.
Too dramatic.
Too impatient.

But the reality is, emotion means you give a fuck and I’d rather have that than work with robots who efficiently execute what’s needed without ever wishing to add, elevate or challenge the status quo.

Of course, the irony is the companies who criticise employees for caring deeply about what they do, tend to also expect their people to be disproportionately passionate and loyal about the company – but guess what fuckers, you can’t have one without the other.

Now I appreciate there are different ways to express emotion …

And when it becomes about what YOU want versus what you want the work to be – they’re very different things.

But having people who care … who deeply want to do the right thing, the better thing and the new thing … is creatively and commercialy far more valuable – let alone interesting – than having an entire department of drones. And yet in these optimisation obsessed times, companies have decided the opposite is true.

Which leads to the point of this post.

Recently I saw this clip of Robert Glasper playing Radiohead’s ‘Everything In It’s Right Place’.

In it, you witness Robert crying as he plays the piece.

The emotional impact he feels because of the piece.

It’s not ego.
It’s not performative.
It’s pure, unfiltered emotion. For a piece of music he didn’t write but feels deeply connected to.

So connected, he gives his all in performing it. To honour what it means to him and what he hopes the audience will get from it.

In many ways, it’s one of the most selfless, geneous acts you could ever witness.

Something I am sure Radiohead would feel honoured by, rather than say:

“Robert … Robert … stop being so emotional about the music. It makes us feel uncomfortable and we don’t know how to deal with it”.

Because that’s the thing … the issue of emotion is not about the person feeling it, but the people who never can.

Who are so disconnected to what they do, the only thing they value is the checklist of what has been done.

Because for them, quality isn’t the goal, it’s productivity.

People who care about what they do and what the company does, is a gift.

It’s why we have to put an end to this false narrative of them being a problem … because they provide life to what so many senior leaders destroy.

Enjoy.


Comments Off on Why Companies Should Be Grateful For Emotional Employees Rather Than Regular Robots …


Why Smart Beats Clever. At Least For Strategists …

One of the things that has always bugged me about some strategists is their desire to be academically victorious in every conversation.

To not just be ‘right’, but to be the ‘rightest of right’.

And then expect wild applause for their proclamations and declarations of self-appointed brilliance.

Putting aside the problematic nature of this behaviour, the irony is it stands in the way of them being able to properly understand – and connect to – how others feel, think, believe or behave … because they’re too busy telling others what they ‘really mean or think’.

And here’s the kicker …

The reality is people often do know what they want, think or think … they just don’t know how to express it clearly.

Which is why the key is the ability to listen rather than to judge. Or explain.

And by listen, I mean listen ‘hard’ …

Not just what is said, but how it is expressed … verbally, visually, contextually.

And while I appreciate we’re in a time poor, distraction rich world … the benefit of doing this is that not only will you have a greater appreciation of how they see the world, they will often reveal opportunities that ‘intellectual logic’ may never see, let alone get to.

Maybe that’s why I love that Lucille Ball quote so much … because in a few words, she articulates the difference between clever and smart.

And where strategy is concerned, smart trumps clever.

That doesn’t mean you don’t care about facts, details, knowledge or academic accuracy, it just means you appreciate that being emotionally resonant with others can achieve more than being academically victorious.

Or as my Dad used to say:

“If you need to show how clever you are, you’re probably not”

I say all this because I saw a brief interview with the singer Billy Idol.

In it, he demonstrates the importance – and craft – of emotional resonance.

The act of understanding what others need to be able to give them the space and place to express.

Not manipulation.
Not exaggeration.
But emotional consideration.

Which is why if a true Rockstar – who has lived the equivalent of 100 lives – can do it, then us poxy strategists should be able to, too.

Watch it, you’ll be a better person for it.

Comments Off on Why Smart Beats Clever. At Least For Strategists …


Don’t Let Temporary People Make Permanent Decisions ….

A while ago, I listened to someone explain one of the best lessons they’d ever learned.

And they said what the title of this post says …

Don’t let temporary people make permenant decisions.

I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it because it has made me realise how much of what we have to deal with in life is because we have done the absolute opposite of that.

And we do have a responsibility in this …

Because while the people who have those positions have been put in there by others in similar positions … we allow them to fuel their commercial and egotistical self-interest by keeping quiet and compliant.

Now I get some people don’t really have a choice.
And I also appreciate people who stand up against it can easily be smothered and discarded.
But when I look at how much of our industry, discipline and life has been fucked over by temporary people making ‘self-interest driven’ permanent decisions, it’s bordering on criminal.

Well, in some cases, it probably is. Allegedly.

From making decisions that blatantly look after friends at the expense of other employees livelihoods through to destroying organisations so they can hit share price bonuses … we’re seeing more and more of these temporary people get paid vast sums even though they leave what they were responsible for, in a worse state than when it started.

Of course, the problem is their definition of ‘responsibility’ is to everyone other than the employees.

Shareholders.
Investors.
Themselves.

And probably not in that order.

So, while I have no problem with people being rewarded very well for doing very well … it’s crazy when ‘very well’ is defined by destruction rather than creation – regardless how hard they try and spin it otherwise.

Comments Off on Don’t Let Temporary People Make Permanent Decisions ….