The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


What Marketing, Advertising, Strategists And Brand Managers Need To Learn From Hostage Negotiators …

Back in 2021 – on April 1 no less, even though it was not a joke – I wrote how I had spoken to a hostage negotiator.

Among the many things he said to me, one that stood out most was this:

“If you have clients that think words – and how you say them – don’t matter, bring them to me. After all, my job is marketing too”.

Of course, the idea hostage negotiating is similar to marketing is absurd … but what I guess they were trying to say is that by understanding the needs, triggers and context of your ‘audience’, you increase the odds of being successful.

Please note the words ‘increasing the odds’.

I say that because the way our industry talks about ‘certainty’ is disturbing.

That doesn’t mean we’re a stupid risk.

Nor does it mean we can’t be more successful than anyone hoped.

But if you’re working with someone ‘guaranteeing’ the outcome, then they’re either downgrading the metrics and criteria for what they classify as success. Messing with the numbers to suit their own needs. Or just bullshiting.

And there’s a lot of bullshitting out there …

Because so much of what we do is only notionally focused on the needs of the audience.

The reality is the vast amount of attention is directed on the wants of our clients.

On one level, I get it. Our job is to help our clients be more successful than they dared imagine. But often we’re not given the chance to do that, because context and criteria has been set. Using data that is has been focused only on the point of purchase … as if there is absolutely no interest whatsoever in who they are, how they feel, the tensions they face and the situations they deal with.

Said another way … how they live, not just how they buy.

And that’s why the comment from the hostage negotiator was really what they thought marketing should be, rather what it often ends up being.

Which is why the real opportunity for us is to learn from them, not the other way around.

Because they’re proof the more you understand your audience – rather than just what you want your audience to do – the more you can make a difference, rather than just make a sale.

To prove that, I encourage you to watch this.

It’s long. But – as is the case with anything you emotionally engage with – it’s worth it.

Especially when you see how much it means to the negotiators. Let alone the hostages.

Which challenges you to think when was the last time you worked with someone who cared so much about who they served, rather than what they could sell them.

Who knows, it might just change your life or career. Or even save it.

Comments Off on What Marketing, Advertising, Strategists And Brand Managers Need To Learn From Hostage Negotiators …


The Systematic Destruction Of Knowledge And Expertise …

I appreciate that at my age, the title of this post may suggest I’m going to whine about companies overlooking people of a certain age for younger, cheaper, hungrier individuals.

I’m not. I get it.

Not only that, while age and knowledge have some level of interconnectedness … I’ve met countless young people who are bloody brilliant [not relative to their age, just bloody brilliant] as well as plenty of people with ‘experience’ who, frankly, aren’t.

What I’m talking about is the blinkered confidence some companies place in their people simply because they’re their people.

On one hand I suppose I should celebrate it, given its not that long ago that companies overlooked internal capability for the external shiny and new.

And while this post does not reflect any of the clients I specifically work with directly, I am seeing and hearing more and more companies go to this other extreme and worse … enabling a level of arrogance in their people that results in any objectivity they face – regardless of the knowledge and expertise of the person delivering it, let alone the desire to help make things more successful – as a threat.

Complicity is the name of the game these days.

Blind acceptance that whatever the person ‘in charge’ says, is right.

A belief internal employees are better informed about every topic than people who are experts in specific topics … so companies can feel great about themselves.

Of course, the issue with this approach is that when things go wrong – or don’t go right enough – everyone else gets the blame. Not just by the person in charge [which you almost expect] but by the company they work for, despite the fact the only reason they gave this employee the project is because they knew a bit more about a subject than senior management, so they saw them as [1] an expert in the field and [2] a cheaper option that bringing in external expertise.

Now you’d think the fear of this outcome would ensure people would stand up for what they believe is right.

Not because they’re arrogant, but because they know their experience and knowledge can disproportionally benefit the end result.

And some do. At least the really good ones …

But even they are under increasing pressure to go along with the whims and wants of certain people/companies … because the whole industry is seeing more and more work being handed to people and companies who simply say yes to whatever is wanted.

Or said another way, convenience and fawning is more valued then expertise, knowledge and standards.

Now of course, it’s human nature to believe we can do more than we actually can.

We all like to think we are ‘special’.
We all like to be acknowledged as important.
We’ve all heard the ‘fake it till you make it’ philosophy.

But the truly special are the ones who know that however good they are, having people around them who are better than them – in different fields – can make them even more effective.

It’s why the World’s best athletes have coaches.

It’s why the World’s best musicians have producers.

It’s why my brilliant ex-NIKE/FFI client, Simon Pestridge, said: “middle management want to be told they’re right. Senior management want to know how they can be better”.

The reason I say all this is that I recently reached out to one of the best organisational psychologists in the World. They work with the CEO’s of some of the most respected and successful companies in the World including Apple, NIKE, Ferrari and Electronic Arts to name a few.

This is what they said when I talked to them about what I was seeing:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“I call them professional imposters and the reason so many succeed in corporations is because they target other imposters. It becomes a co-dependent relationship where they ensure their ego, status or promotion opportunities won’t be challenged.”

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To be honest, I was not shocked by their view, I was more shocked by the acknowledgment.

Of course, I probably shouldn’t be. It’s hardly a new phenomenon and we also had one of the most successful shows in TV history shine a light on it …

Succession was a celebration of the role of co-dependence and complicity within organisations.

As I wrote recently, Tom was the epitome of it.

But this post is about Tom before he ‘won’ [even though he is still a pawn to the real power] … this is about Tom when he just wanted to please to win favour. Where he thought nothing of being vicious and vindictive to those beneath him because he knew that didn’t just please the people above him, it let him feel he was above everyone around him.

And so Tom eventually gets promoted beyond his capability …

Where the illusion of power and external fawning is more important to him than pay checks.

Where his belief is he is superior to all, regardless of knowledge or experience.

Where his understanding of situations is the only understanding of a situation.

Yeah, it’s bleak. It’s fucking bleak. Because while Tom was fiction, Trump got to be President of America. And what makes it worse is we all see it. Hell, we’ve probably all been exposed to it. And yet it goes on.

If companies truly want to be great, then they’ve got to kill and stop rewarding toxic positivity … because value will be revealed when they allow more people to say no to them and they say yes to more people.

Comments Off on The Systematic Destruction Of Knowledge And Expertise …


Cut The Crap …

I was going through some old folders when I found this lovely campaign for Staedtler Highlighters.

To give a highlighter a desirable role in society is a pretty big achievement.

OK, so it’s not as thought-provoking as that door handles ad I wrote about, but it’s pretty close.

But this post isn’t about celebrating luminous green … it’s about what it is promoting: Getting to the point.

Or as this post is titled, cutting the crap.

And my god is there a lot of crap to cut.

The great irony of the above ad is that what it uses to demonstrate its ability to get to the point is something you would see in many companies self-descriptions.

Over-inflated, self-important expressions of what they do and how they do it.

It’s everywhere.

From the umbrella stand that claims to be a protection and lifestyle solutions company to We Work who decided they were a tech company simply because they had an app that people used to book a fucking room.

Look I get we all want to feel validated in what we do.

I get it provides an ability to charge a premium.

But just because you say it doesn’t mean others will think it’s true.

In fact, it can have the total opposite effect … where the good things you do are clouded by the fairy dust being constantly released.

With tech enabling people to check claims like never before, it blows my mind how much delusional ego inflation continues to rise.

Of course, part of it is because companies feel they can continue to get away with it … and there’s an element of truth in that, except in many cases, it’s because no one gives a shit about who they are or what they say and so the relationship is shallower than a Hollywood romance.

10,000 years ago I wrote about something I called unplanning … and in many ways, it’s more relevant now than it’s ever been.

That doesn’t mean being brutally honest downplays your role or value, if anything it can elevate it … especially when surrounded by big talking idiocy. But it’s more than simply differentiating from a crowded competitive space, because as someone wise once said to me, “nothing makes mistakes like someone who can’t be honest with themselves”.

Comments Off on Cut The Crap …


Why Brand Assets Can Become Concrete Blocks …

Late last year, Metallica launched a new song called LuxEterna, from their upcoming new album, 72.

While it is a brilliant return to their roots, the choice of ‘yellow’ as a key colour was met with some negative commentary from ‘brand purists’.

I don’t mean fans, but brand and design folks.

This was amazing for 2 reasons.

The first is our job is to keep things moving evolving rather than continually replicating what’s gone before, so if anyone should be open minded to change, it’s brand and design folk.

[It also highlights my problem with people who keep banging on about ‘brand assets’, because they are confusing recognition with interesting. Or worse, thinking recognition beats being and doing interesting stuff for audiences]

Secondly, the album was designed – as many have been – by the brilliant folk at the wonderful Turner Duckworth … and given their body of work, if anyone knows about designing modern iconography, it’s them.

But overall, I just found the whole debate amusing.

Metallica have always approached albums as a way to express their current frame of creative mind … and given they always look to inject something new or challenging into their work, the choice of yellow seems the perfect way to communicate ‘next chapter’.

In the case of 27 Seasons – also known as the first 18, and arguably, most significant years of your life – James said this …

“There’s been a lot of darkness in my life and in our career and things that have happened with us … but always having a sense of hope, always having the light that is in that darkness, keeps us moving. Without darkness, there’s no light, and being able to focus a little more on the light instead of how it used to be and how horrible it is, that can only be a good thing. There’s a lot of good things going on in life — focusing on that instead helps to balance out my life. And there’s no one meaning to it — everyone has some sense of hope or light in their life, and, obviously, music is mine.“

When you read that, it’s not hard to work out that the use of yellow is part of a bigger idea around the album rather than a desire to build a one colour brand which some have claimed.

Unsurprisingly, they’re the same people who talk about brand assets like you can just buy them off the shelf rather than make them a byproduct of what you do, so that they have value in them that you also keep building.

By pure chance, I was asked by people connected to the band to do a talk to a music publishing company.

While not specifically related to Metallica, I was asked by someone in the audience for my opinion on their ‘new image’ and whether it risked upsetting their core audience.

I had thought this question may came up, which is why I had prepared an answer.

After informing them I had never known a brand – let alone a band – who knew their audience as well as them … and if you listen to the track, I doubt any of their fans would mistake a revitalised Metallica for Ed Sheeran … I said this.

“If Rock n’ Roll is about rebellion, then surely there’s nothing more rock n’ roll than Metallica using yellow rather than the category norm of black?”

It was met with applause.

And some disgust, hahaha.

But here’s the thing …

Brands – and bands – don’t move forward if all they do is give audiences the same thing over and over again. Nor will they if they just give audiences exactly what they want over and over again. Longevity is as much about keeping people on their toes as it is satisfying their passion and curiosity and you only stand a chance of achieving that by following what interests you, not what interests everyone else.

Metallica get this more than most.

It’s part of the reason they have stayed at the top … because by doing things that interest them, they do things that interests more people rather than just the same people.

As I wrote for MTV years ago, brands can learn a lot from bands … because while brands may think finding shortcuts or disguises allows them to optimise their efficiency, everyone else can tell it’s because they’ve run out of ideas or energy.

____________________________________________________________________

By the way, 72 Seasons comes out tomorrow. This is not a sponsored post. Well, not directly anyway, hahaha.

Comments Off on Why Brand Assets Can Become Concrete Blocks …


Big Enough To Matter, But Not Big Enough To Count …

Recently I was reading an article on Brexit when I came across a comment that stopped me in my tracks.

The reason for it is that in a few words – literally a few – it not only highlighted the issue with many of the shortsighted fools who voted for leaving the European Union – and likely voted for the election of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss – but also could be used to explain the decline of so many companies, institutions and individuals.

This is it …

What a perfectly constructed sentence.

A devastating set of words that places you perfectly in a corner you can’t get out of.

It’s almost a Hollywood movie line it’s so crafted in its underlying viciousness.

But of course, the people it challenges won’t accept it.

They will continue to refuse to acknowledge their complicity in the situation millions now face.

Because as I’ve written before, people has difficulty understanding something when their credibility and reputation depends on them not understanding something.

It’s why they will continue to cast blame on everyone else.

Why they will continue to claim the opposition are more dangerous than the government they voted in … the government that has brought an entire nation to its knees.

But let’s be honest, the reason for their attitude is even uglier than not wanting to own up to what they contributed to. Because for all their claims of wanting a ‘better Britain’ … the real reason behind their choice was to create a barrier between them and people they think are beneath them.

A way to feel socially, morally, professionally superior to those around them, while conveniently choosing to ignore they were either given great advantage from birth over the vast majority of people or seek to mitigate their situation by blaming everyone else for what they have not achieved, despite starting from greater advantage.

I get it. It’s kind-of human nature. It’s also the unspoken truth of democracy – where the reality is we tend to vote for what works for you rather than what’s right for the nation.

Of course the unspoken truth is still better than the alternative … however given the way politics and business are increasingly allowing spin, vitriol and lies, it seems we’re seeing ‘post truth’ as an accepted and embraced business strategy.

And that’s why the independent voice has never been so important.

Not just in the public domain, but within organisations, governments and individual groups.

Not to attack, destroy or dethrone – as is the current trend – but to protect.

To ensure the people making decisions – or the people asking to decide on the options – are aware of the range of possibilities and outcomes that could occur rather than just blindly following a blinkered promise of what will happen.

Not delivered with hyperbole or exaggeration, but with quiet, informed context and facts … delivered by an individual or organisation without political affiliation and respected for their independence.

It doesn’t mean it will stop things like Brexit happening, but it will ensure people who knowingly bend the truths to suit their own agenda or were deliberately ignorant to the choices they made are held to account. Because without that, we carry on down this sorry path where governments, organisations or individuals can choose to ignore previous choices they made, ignore the passing of time that changes the context of everything and ignore the realities others may have caught up and left us behind.

I am under no illusion that the truth hurts, but delusion damages us forever.

Comments Off on Big Enough To Matter, But Not Big Enough To Count …