The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


Everyone thinks they’re different. Everyone is exactly the same …

This is my last post for a couple of weeks as I head off on a stupid trip around the World.

Los Angeles.
London.
Milan.
Amsterdam.
And finally … Berlin.

While I’m excited for all the places I’m going – even more so, the people I’m meeting – I am especially excited about going to Berlin.

Part of that is because it’s one of my favourite cities.
Part of that is because I get to see some friends I’ve not seen for years.
Part of that is because I’ve been kindly invited to speak at the GWA/Strategy Collective ‘Strat Con’ conference.

The topic of the conference is basically a discussion around the future of strategy … which is appropriate given I think if we carry on the way we’re going, there won’t be one. Or at least a bright one.

And why do I say this?

Well, it should be obvious, but if I had to sum it up it’s this:

Everyone thinks they’re different. Everyone is exactly the same.

Of course, a lot of this is because we all use the same tools, systems, models and approaches.

Where the goal is less about impact and change and far more about ‘packaging efficiency’, all reinforced by ‘for profit’ gurus who flog their systems – and themselves – as business superchargers when they’re insurance salesmen enforcing a self-interest driven definition of category convention.

Add to this the increasing amount of clients who want anything relating to their business, their audience or their competitors sanitized or erased from the ‘planning process’ to ensure their ego remains unharmed, and you can see why it’s not just strategy fighting for its relevance, but marketing as a whole.

It’s kind-of why I also find it hilarious we’re so worried about AI when the real problem is us.

Our complicity to formats and systems means innovation, invention and originality is literally being filtered out of our process and thinking so how they hell can we complain about AI when we’re making it so easy to duplicate us.

If you think this means my talk at Strat Con is going to be depressing, you’re right … it is.

Or should I say the first half is …

The second half will hopefully leave the attendees feeling a bit more hopeful.

Maybe excited even.

We’ll see … I hope so, I want the discipline and the industry to win.

And the good news is we have the talent, the brains and the creativity to do it … we just need to step out of the ‘brain jail’ we’ve all slowly walked our way into, encouraged and pushed by certain individuals who have a vested financial interest in taking us there and then keeping us there.

So see you in a couple of weeks, because while I’ll be back from my trip much shorter than that, I think we all could do with a rest from me.

Including me.

Besides, any bruises I end up with after my speech will need some time to recover.

Ta-ra. See you on Monday 13th July.

Comments Off on Everyone thinks they’re different. Everyone is exactly the same …


How To Be A Great Client Who Creates Great Work …

I’ve been around.

I’ve been doing this strategy thing for longer than many who read this blog have been alive.

And of all the things I’ve learned, one of the most valuable has been to never doubt the importance of having a good client.

To be clear, a ‘good client’ doesn’t mean they never challenge you. Or place high expectations on you. Or resist the urge to add pressure to what needs to be done and by when.

The reality is good clients do all those things. The difference is how they do it and why.

Because a good client acts as a proper partner.
They take responsibility for what they need to make happen.
They calm and control the internal noise, voices and opinions.
They share your ambition for the work, not just for the desired impact of the work.
They welcome, encourage and invite truth and transparency.
They remove the barriers and fears that stand in the way of making something great.
The don’t blame, shame or complain – they stay the course and know when to get involved and, just as importantly, stay out the way.
They never dictate … because they’re always clear with what needs to be done and why.
And if things change, they tell you early and transparently.
Plus you know they will have done what they can before that situation occurred.
They always listen at least as much as they talk.
They brief with an actual document not just a casual conversation.
They give feedback that is objective rather than just subjective
They don’t let internal processes stand in the way of opportunities that come their way.
They trust you and your expertise and look for the best rather than seek out the worst.
And they never, never treat you like you’re a servant, commodity or low-level employee.

They do all those things.

All of them. All the time.

Which is why you can have all the processes in the world …

You can have all the systems, data, structures and efficiency tools …

But not one of those comes close to what a great client can deliver and do.

For the work.
For the business.
For the customers and employees.
And for making sure you do everything you can to given them the work of their lives.

We don’t talk about this enough.

And we certainly don’t teach it or train it.

Instead, we keep hearing how we must adhere to a singular process or format, regardless of category or context, even though it has often been created by people who have never made anything of note and if they have, in one area and one area only.

You can tell who they are because they love to sound like they are business liberators when – as I’ve said many times – they’re far more like insurance salesmen.

And that’s find if you want that sort of thing – but often that is never how it is sold. Now of course I understand there’s huge costs and risks associated with creativity and marketing … but there’s a major difference between playing to win and playing not to lose … which is why there’s a huge difference between a client who uses process and deliverables as a stick and those who operate via transparency, taste and trust.

And for those of you who don’t think one person can negatively – or positively – influence the output of a corporation, even if they have built an approach and format that has been tested over years, I refer you to the quote by the Dalai Lama.

“If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito”

We need more training from the people who have made great things happen and over again …

Actual things, not just theories, self promotion or

Comments Off on How To Be A Great Client Who Creates Great Work …


Why The Industry Needs To Go To Specsavers So We Can See The Difference Between An Idea And An Execution …

As it’s Monday, let me start this post with some good news.

This is the last week of posts for a while as I’m flying off to Europe on Friday.

Not for a holiday.
Not for Colenso.
But for a stream of meetings in LA, London, Amsterdam, Milan and Berlin.

All in 8 days. Darrrrrling.

God, what an asshole humble brag. That isn’t even humble.

Which is why I am not asking you to feel sorry for me because [1] I’m not stupid and [2] 8 days or not, it’s a fucking dream gig. However – if it makes you feel any better – while all of these trips are at the invitation of a range of different VIP’s, I’m only going because they want me to be their cat litter tray rather than be a valued guest.

Did that make you feel less loathing towards me?

What about making the darkness of Monday morning feel a bit brighter?

No? OK … better move quickly on.

So not too long ago, I wrote a post about the brilliant Trevor Beattie and his brilliant analysis of the modern Specsavers creative work.

Specifically, the strategic shift from ‘what it was’ to ‘what it is’.

And while he didn’t say the current work doesn’t live up to the standards of the original work, his central point highlights – at least to me – why I don’t think it does, exemplified by this piece of work that I saw near our office recently.

I should point out this gives me no joy to say whatsoever, because:

1. Specsavers played a significant role in saving my sight by recognizing my disease early and then writing a referral letter for me to urgently see a specialist.
2. Specsavers has continually proved the commercial and creative power of s great idea.
3. The shift Trevor highlighted, may – for reasons I don’t quite understand – be deliberate.

But whatever is behind it … going from the comedic potential of not seeing properly to laughing at the incurably stupid … has potentially resulted in moving the brand from friend to foe.

Or worse, bully.

Now whether they meant this to happen or not is anyone’s guess.

I’m assuming not.

Which reinforces the need to always understand the nuance of an idea – because if you don’t do that, you don’t just undermine years of craft, care and rigor, you undermine the very value you are being paid to elevate.

See my recent post about the billboard for the movie, Devil Wears Prada 2.

There’s too much complexity in our business. But solving it with simplistic interpretation doesn’t help anyone either.

Which suggests every creative, strategist, suit and marketer may need to go to Specsavers to see how to do their job properly.

With craft.
With rigor.
With care.
With an ability to actually – ironically – see it.

And with an understanding of the nuance behind the idea so your work – whaever role you play – is always building the brand up rather than tearing it down.

Comments Off on Why The Industry Needs To Go To Specsavers So We Can See The Difference Between An Idea And An Execution …


In The Quest To Be Fast, We Make The Chance Of Real Change, Very Slow ….

I was talking to someone recently about town planning – don’t ask – and mentioned a story I’d heard about a Chinese architect.

Apparently a local Shanghai government council had reached out to him asking to help design a new area of their district. As part of their briefing, they’d said they wanted it to look and feel like parts of New York. This architect went on to explain that it wasn’t possible because what had really impacted how NYC was designed, was time.

I would link to the article because I wrote a post about it years ago, but can I find it? Can I hell.

Anyway, this got me thinking about creativity and how – with the pressure to PROVE our work is effective in the shortest amount of time possible or face the risk of the client firing us – we may be stopping our ideas from ever fulfilling their full potential.

Or the clients are.

Now I appreciate we live in competitive times.

I also appreciate there needs to see signs of positive impact and/or change along the way, rather than just have blind faith.

But we also need to acknowledge that some ideas take time to find their time. Or audience.

History is littered with examples of this but they didn’t happen because someone forced it, it’s because there needed to be the conditions for it.

The point being, that I am fed up of the narrative that ad agencies don’t care about effectiveness. Almost as fed up as I am that consultancies like McKinsey, Bain and Deloittes are the masters of it. Putting aside their whole business model is founded on telling companies what to do rather than take any responsibility for fixing any of it – we need the clients to be part of the solution. To commit in terms of attitude, conditions and time.

The quest for quick wins is increasingly resulting in us getting exactly that. A quick win … not a long, lasting and sustainable win.

Because we’re so focused on speed, we fail to value the need and impact of time.

Comments Off on In The Quest To Be Fast, We Make The Chance Of Real Change, Very Slow ….


Why British Airways Is The Mini Metro Of Airlines …

The next few weeks are big for me.

My birthday.
Jill’s birthday.
Paul’s birthday.
The World Cup starting.
Trips to LA, Milan, Berlin, London and Amsterdam.
Meetings and dinners with legends of film, fashion and music.
And a bunch of lovely planners in Germany, hahaha.

I’d love to pretend I’m nonchalant about it all, but that would be a massive fucking lie as I’m exited to fuck about it all – bar my birthday.

But this post isn’t about my impending weeks of mega-madness, it’s about the madness of dealing with British Airways.

I am in the incredibly lucky situation of having someone pay for all my flights.

Better yet, they are paying for them to all be Business Class.

I booked on Air New Zealand, who – because of the flight itinerary – also scheduled some of the flights on BA.

So far. So good.

Having chosen my seats on Air NZ, I went to BA to do the same with them … except my booking reference didn’t work.

I then tried logging into my British Airways Frequent Flyer account, but got the same response.

No problems, maybe they use a different booking reference, so I contacted Air NZ to ask – and they told me, they use the same number and so it should work.

So I tried again. Nothing.
So I tried calling. No answer.
So I tried their chatbot. No reply.

It was getting frustrating so I went on the website to see if there was another way to contact them and there was.

A customer service contact button. So I clicked on it and what did I find when I did that …

A postal address.

A fucking postal address!

They want me to write – from New Zealand – to work out why my booking reference number doesn’t work. Mind blowing.

But it gets worse …

You see, I went back to Air NZ and told them the situation and they said they would talk to BA on my behalf. And they did.

So after 3 attempts for the website to accept my login details, I go on there to choose my business class seats and what do I find?

Yep, they want to CHARGE ME for choosing a seat.

This on top of the fact it has already cost a fuck-ton of cash.

Now I appreciate this is a first world problem.
I totally get I’m incredibly fortunate to be able to experience this.
But it blows-my-fucking mind that BA wants to charge me even more money to choose which seat I fly in – especially when airlines like Air NZ, let you do it when you fly economy.

Now I should point out BA have said once check-in is open – ie: 24 hours before the flight leaves – I can choose my seat for free, but apart from that still being bollocks, I am pretty sure when I try to do it, they’ll tell me I have to mail in my request by post.

Uncommon have done some amazing work for British Airways.

They have elevated their standing and prestige with some beautiful work.

And the line they created – A British Original – sounds great, until you remember that the British Leyland Mini Metro and also one of those and was a fucking shit experience as well.

Comments Off on Why British Airways Is The Mini Metro Of Airlines …