The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


If Great Was Easy, We’d All Be Doing It …

One of the scariest, awesome things is starting a new project.

Especially a new project where you are given the freedom to take things to new places.

Scary, because there’s always the risk. you might fuck it up.

Awesome, because you can – in theory – go wherever the hell you like.

I love these moments.

I love exploring all the possibilities and then seeing where everyone’s energy is at.

I love the drama, the challenge, the breakthroughs and the crafting.

But most of all, I love the creation.

Seeing something come to life that wasn’t there before.

But to get to a place that excites rather than appeases, is emotionally draining and stimulating.

The process – if that is what you want to call it – is one that tests you more than tests the idea you’re developing.

And frankly we don’t talk about that enough.

Instead, we celebrate precision, perfection, optimization and logic.

And while there may well be elements of all that in all we do, they sure-as-shit don’t happen at the beginning of the process … and if you think they do, then you’re either kidding yourself or you haven’t tried hard enough.

But what’s scary is a lot of the way the industry is structuring themselves is to kid themselves or not try hard enough.

Too many people running our industry are people not from our industry – so they don’t understand how it works.

They see the rabbit holes we need to go down as a waste of time.

A costly exercise in the delivery of our ‘product’.

And while I appreciate you can take too long on things, you can also take too little time …

But that’s where we’re heading … where effectiveness is defined and determined by ‘delivery timelines’ or ‘fitting in’ to pre-determined definitions rather than trying to do something new … something different … something better.

Which is why it’s so funny so many brand and management consultancies talk about ‘brand transformation’ … because you can’t transform if you stick to predefined and predetermined rules, processes and logic. But then – as Lee Hill once told me – they’re not really transforming anyone or anything. What many are really doing is helping old and slow companies catch up with what everyone else in their category has been doing for an age. It means the consultancy can profit from articulating the learnings from the more progressive companies – rather than develop new possibilities and processes of their own – and wrap it up in expensive language that benefits both parties.

Or said another way … ‘catching up’ is sold as innovation and ‘duplication’ is sold as expertise.

OK, I’m being a little harsh there, but the point is … anyone who says creativity and progress can be delivered via a consistent, precise and stable process is either lying to themselves or lying to you. So don’t see the rollercoaster of the creative process as a cost, see it as people who want to make sure they do something really special for you.

Comments Off on If Great Was Easy, We’d All Be Doing It …


Pitch Versus Reality …

Let’s be honest, when we want something we often show an ‘unnaturally good side’ of ourselves in an attempt to win someone over.

Doesn’t matter if it’s dating, business, or even getting someone to take out the bins … we are all capable of turning on our manipulation skills when it suits.

Nothing embodies this more than the agency pitch …

Where they bring out the most senior of senior leadership to the meetings …
Where they promise access to ‘the best of the best across the whole network’ …
Where they talk about developing specialised processes, systems and tools …
Where they discuss building a dedicated agency arm just for their service …
Where they say they’re open to new financial remuneration models and approaches …

And while I am in no way suggesting they’re lying about this, it rarely turns out like this.

There’s many reasons for that, of which one of them is prospective clients are also playing the same game …

Talking about the groundbreaking work they want …
Promising to provide good budgets, access and timelines …
Reinforcing how much they want a long-term partnership …
Championing the importance of debate and discussion …
Suggesting openness to new ways of working …

Again, not lying … but also not being entirely honest either.

If I’m being generous, a lot of this is because life and business is constantly changing and evolving so promised need to keep changing … however at the end of the day, the real problem isn’t that things change, it’s that we’re frightened of being transparent.

The irony of which is the greatest demonstration of respect – and arguably, the greatest way to build real trust – is being transparent.

By that I mean telling those around you, what is happening, when it’s happening.

Sure, I get there can be implications in doing that, but there’s far more if you delay speaking up …

It’s why I love Angela – Colenso’s CEO – attitude that ‘honesty trumps harmony’.

She’s right …

And while I appreciate it may not always be a comfortable conversation at the beginning … if you do it in a timely and transparent way, it always ends up being better than the alternative. That being people discovering the reality of the situation because of the disaster of the situation.

And yet so many still think that is a better way to deal with things … believing they can either overcome the situation or can hide the situation.

So why am I saying all this?

To be honest, I just wanted a way to justify posting these 2 photos because while the sum up the point of this post, the reality is they just made me piss myself laughing …

Because they’re true.

Oh so true.

The pitch …

The reality …

Comments Off on Pitch Versus Reality …


Why Do You Think They Call It Dumb?

I’m back. I know, how terrible.

Which is why I have some good news for you, because I’m going to be away again in a few weeks. So you only have to endure the pain a little longer before you get ANOTHER reprieve. I know, I’m a Saint.

That said, I had a wonderful time, especially at State of Social in Perth.

Meg – the founder of the conference – has created a truly special event and like StratCon in Berlin, there’s a bunch of stuff other conference organizers could learn from them that would benefit audiences and the industry at large.

Anyway, I’ll be writing about that later, so shall we get the pain of me being back over as quickly as possible?

So as many of you know, I love tech.

Not just the practical stuff, but the ridiculous.

Robot dogs.
Robot rabbits.
Robot balls.
Robot guitars.
Hell, I even bought a, errrrrm, robot mother once.

My house is almost fully automated.
My car is filled with the sort of optional extras the engineers only come up with as a joke.
And don’t get me started on my history with smartphones.

And yet, despite my addiction to stupidity … I totally appreciate there are downsides to technology.

The scrolling,
The timewasting.
The interruption.
The distractions.

And that’s before we get to the blood-pressure inducing annoyance of hearing every fucking company try and claim they’re in the tech/AI space just because they use ChatGPT to write their Linkedin ‘thought leadership’ social landfill bollocks.

So, it’s no surprise we’ve started to see the backlash …

People fighting against companies outsourcing jobs to AI.
Society pushing back on the serving of AI slop.
Companies balking at the prices being charged for AI access.
Investment firms questioning the long-term viability of AI industries.
And then – at a much lower level – shoppers increasingly choosing dumb-tech over high-tech.

You know what I’m talking about …

Products that strip back their functionality to their bare essentials:

Cameras that only allow you to point and click.
Tablets that only allow you to read your books.
And phones that only allow you to make and receive calls and texts.

Will this result in bringing the tech giants down?

Probably not … but as I’ve written before, if the Tech Bros carry on their current path and hoodwink companies into outsourcing their entire operations to AI under the guise of increased profits and efficiency, who the hell will be around to buy the products they make or advertise?

But I’m going off on a tangent because when I was in NYC, I saw this …

Now, I don’t know about you, but a phone that gives you whatsapp, maps, uber ‘and more’ … is the opposite of a dumbphone.

Maybe it could be defined as the ‘night-out phone’.
Or – at a push – the ‘bare essentials’ phone.
But it sure-as-shit isn’t a dumb-phone …

That is unless the term ‘dumb’ is being used to describe the people they want to buy it and then maybe they’re onto something. Except, one look at their website and you realise they really believe what they’re peddling … which suggests whether it’s the tech bros or the idiots, we’re doomed either way.

Have a great day. Hahahaha.

Comments Off on Why Do You Think They Call It Dumb?


You Don’t Have To Be A Prick …

On Tuesday I wrote about how we have our priorities messed up …

If you haven’t read it, you can see it here.

The underlying point being we seem to accept the shitty behaviour of the super rich, but are hyper-critical of the humble – even though we know the former are making choices to become even richer whereas the latter are simply trying to survive.

In the post, I highlighted a valuable lesson I learned when I was starting out in my career from my then client – and now mentor – the wonderful Lee Hill.

He told me:

“There’s nothing wrong making lots of money, it’s how you do it and what you do with it that counts”.

It would be easy to think that in this Trumpian, authoritarian World, the ability to be ‘decent and rich’ is a pipe dream.

But I remember many years ago, George interviewed a bunch of wealthy people for a project we were doing at Cynic and came back saying he had discovered a group he called ‘the reluctantly rich’.

Basically, these were people who had made a lot of money but never felt they deserved it.

Maybe they inherited it, maybe they were in the right place at the right time … maybe they were just lucky … but they didn’t connect to it so did all they could to be generous to others with it.

Some to that was because it helped offset their guilt a little bit.
Some was their way to let others experience what they were going through.
But most of it was simply because they wanted to help others who hadn’t been blessed with the good fortune they’d received.

Often this was done quietly and privately because the goal was never about recieving gratitude, they just wanted to do some good with it, helped by the fact they never felt connected to the cash, so giving it away was easy … even though they were perfectly aware of what it offered and could do.

Admittedly there weren’t masses of people who felt this way, but there were more than a few.

Still are.

I say this because recently I saw a video of Steve Wozniak – Woz – the co-founder of Apple.

At a time where Musk, Bezos, Zuck and countless other ultra-wealthy tech and finance bros revel in their elitist, vulgar, arrogant lifestyles, he is a reminder of when the tech industry consisted of a few people trying stuff they hoped could help millions grow, express and explore their lives … which is a world away from where we are today, where the tech industry seems to be a few people designing products that enable them to control, contain and restrain millions for their own, fucked-up benefit.

So thank you Mr Woz, you’ve just proved you don’t have to be a prick to be rich.

It just feels that way.

Comments Off on You Don’t Have To Be A Prick …


Isn’t It Sad That The People With All The Answers To All The Problems In The World Shunned Medicine, Science Or Politics And Chose To Become A 24/7, Linkedin Pundit Instead …
June 24, 2026, 6:05 am
Filed under: 2026, A Bit Of Inspiration, Confidence, Delusion, Linkedin, Marketing Fail

I’ve got to be honest, I’m getting fed up reading certain people’s sarcastic comments on other people’s posts on Linkedin.

I could maybe handle it more if they were responding to something offensive or idiotic.

I could maybe tolerate it more if the commenter had a long history of doing things that were truly special.

And I could maybe accept it more if they had a track record of posting interesting and well considered posts of their own over time

But in most cases, none of these ‘occasional acceptable’ filters are true, because not only is the only thing these people are synonymous with is trolling others posts … the issues they attack are, for all intents and purpose, harmless observations or a badly phrased updates.

But there they are, fulfilling their ‘main character’ delusions by going on the attack with a smug ferocity that makes you think they’re a fully paid-up member of the Andrew Tate fuckwit gang.

Talking of Andrew Tate … their responses always sound like they’ve been shaped by that manosphere twat.

You just know they’re convinced their retort is as sharp as a knife being plunged deep between someone else’s eyes, but to everyone else, we simply see their comments as blunt and missing the spot by a mile.

There’s one person in particular who seems to have all the sniper skills of a blind, drunk man … but that doesn’t stop him. Every day I see him make an attempt to churn out a sarcastic comment, even though his words always come across as inane and as confusing as the person he’s attempting to ridicule.

The funniest part is you just know they think this makes them look clever to others …

Or they hope they do, because that’s the characteristic they desire most in the world.

You can tell this by the other way they behave on Linkedin …

Crawling and fawning to people who have achieved the level of industry status and fame they crave … with the caveat, the people they aspire to be tend to all express themselves with the level of self-righteous arrogance that would put Nigel Farrage to shame.

Of course, many can respond to comments on Linkedin without ever looking stupid, arrogant or desperate for attention.

And there’s even a few who can pull it off while being openly sarcastic and confronting. [Albeit because they’re smart, experienced and their comments are actually addressing an issue that needs challenging]

But the individuals I’m talking about don’t fit either of that criteria …

So, while they may be fooling themselves into thinking they’re sharp, witty and successful-as-hell … they’re not fooling anyone else.

Which is why I love they keep posting.

Because the more they think it elevates them, the more it’s bringing them down.

Comments Off on Isn’t It Sad That The People With All The Answers To All The Problems In The World Shunned Medicine, Science Or Politics And Chose To Become A 24/7, Linkedin Pundit Instead …