The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]

So recently, I saw a quote recently I loved.

It was by Arnold Glasgow, the American businessman and satirist who said:

“Consider how hard it is to change yourself and you’ll understand what little chance you have trying to change others”.

I say this because too many brands – and agencies – think they can.

Worse, they think they can with an ad … an ad that either tells people specifically what to do/what they should do and/or a list of product attributes that they believe will make someone immediately stop whatever it is they have been doing for decades and change tact because they’ve suddenly been ‘enlightened’.

Of course, this is not entirely the fault of agencies and clients.

Too often, it is backed up by some for-profit research group who has said their findings prove – without any possible doubt – this is what people will do and, even more importantly, want to do.

Now this is not an anti-research stance. Or an anti-agency or client diatribe.

The reality is we need some sort of foundation of information to make choices and decisions and research – when done well, like everything in life – is a universally established way to achieve that BUT … and it’s a big but … the definitive and delusional nature of how our industry talks borders on bonkers.

I get we don’t like risk.
I get what we do is bloody expensive.
I get there are big implications on getting things wrong.

But nothing – and I mean nothing – can be guaranteed and yet so much of the business acts like it can be, conveniently choosing to ignore the landfill of failings from organisations who have researched every part of everything they do for in every aspect of their life.

Sure, it can increase the odds of success … like advertising.
Sure, it is better than not doing anything at all … like advertising.
But everyone acting like whatever they are going to do is ‘a dead cert’ is an act of commercial complicity and co-dependency that borders on Comms Stockholm Syndrome.

A long time ago, when I was maybe a bit more of a menace, a media agency told a client – with me in the room – that they could guarantee they’d HIT their sales target if a particular amount was invested.

I asked, “but you don’t know what the idea is yet and surely that has a role in the level of impact and/or investment that needs to be made?” … to which they said their ‘proprietary data’ gave them the commercial insight that helped their clients achieve their goals.

So back at the office – pissed off – I sent them an email saying this was the work.

Obviously, it did not go down well, but then neither did their ‘strategy’ of just throwing money at the wall until they hit the magic number.

Again, I appreciate we all need information to base choices and decisions on, but we’re getting way too generalistic, simplistic and egotistic in our approaches and methodologies – which is why the sooner we remember how hard it is for us to change any part of who we are, the sooner we may start accepting it takes far more than a business goal … a focus group commentary … a marketing methodology or an ad to get people to even consider doing what you want them to do and so maybe – just maybe – it will encourage us all to start playing up to a new standards rather than down to complicit convenience.

But I wouldn’t hold your breath, which is why I finish this rant with a post that I saw recently I also loved – albeit with ‘paraphrased interpretation’.

Thankfully not everyone is like this.

As proven by the fact, they tend to be the ones behind the stuff we all wish we were behind.

Or as my friend said recently, ‘they’re the ones who play to create change, not communicate everything exactly the same’.

Oh, I feel better for that. Thank you for [not] reading, hahaha.