The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


A Word Of Advice On Advice …

Just a reminder that anyone who delivers feedback that’s purposefully designed to push you down while actively lifting themselves up, is an asshole.

No ifs. Just butts – so to speak.

Just to be clear, that doesn’t mean people can’t take feedback.

That doesn’t mean people can’t take tough feedback.

That doesn’t mean they’re being ‘woke’.

If anything, it’s how you ensure your feedback is understood rather than just heard.

I say this because far too many people use feedback like a sword and seemingly feel happy about it … which not only means they’re a prick, but that they have deliberately chosen to ignore the recipients feelings as well as where they may be complicit in what’s happened.

Which is why if anyone needs a reminder on why remembering this approach is not good – which is terrifying in itself, but so be it – check out the stories on Corporate Gaslighting.

And don’t think I’m not looking at HR departments for their role in allowing this to happen.

If I need to remind you, your job is to protect the people, not the C-Suite.

Thank god for the good ones out there … the ones who make is a worthy profession rather than the scapegoat department.

Happy Monday, hahaha.

Comments Off on A Word Of Advice On Advice …


The Case For Circumstantial Evidence …

Bloody hell, it’s the 1st September. Already.

This year has gone so quickly, which takes me back to this post I wrote about ‘the speed our kids grow up‘ and I am close to begrudging September before it’s even begun.

But hey, it’s Monday and no one needs more shit to deal with than that, so instead I’m going to swiftly move on before we all reach for the kitchen drawer and look for the sharpest knife.

Or maybe that’s just me.

So this post is about birthday cards.

No … it’s not April Fools, it really is.

I swear there have only been 2 sorts of birthday cards ever created: The sincere ones and the ‘sarcastic’ ones.

The former is an expression of how much someone means to you and the best wishes you have for their special day. The latter basically takes the piss about how fucking old you are.

That’s it.

A tried and tested formula through the ages.

Which is why I was pretty surprised when I saw this:

Sure, it’s funny.
Sure, it’s original.
But it’s also something else …

Validation.

Validation for the members of society who are saying the economy is bad while too many politicians try to claim it isn’t.

It may seem a small thing, but it’s also big … because the only reason the card industry would step away from their tried and tested birthday formula is when they see a big enough commercial reason to do it.

And it appears that the harshness of the economy is – apparently – a big enough reason.

So while I wouldn’t base all my argument on this fact, sometimes its the circumstantial evidence that is the most damning.

__________________________________________________________________________________

One last thing:

Today is my 18th wedding anniversary and I GUARANTEE my wife has – consciously or subconsciously – forgotten about it.

So … as she never reads this blog, I will show her this post to prove I remembered and she didn’t, allowing me to ‘lord it’ over her in a rare moment of triumph and glee.

Oh who am I kidding, but it’s worth a try … it can’t be any more stupid than when we decided to have a ‘Diet Coke’ fountain at our wedding that turned into one giant, bubble of stupidity – as captured in the photo below, with my wonderful Mum peering over, ready to capture the idiocy with her camera.

Happy anniversary Jill. At least its important enough for one of us to remember ; )

Comments Off on The Case For Circumstantial Evidence …


We’ll All Do Better When We Stop Thinking Humans Are Robots …

It’s been a while since I’ve had an all-out rant, but here we go.

So recently, I saw a quote recently I loved.

It was by Arnold Glasgow, the American businessman and satirist who said:

“Consider how hard it is to change yourself and you’ll understand what little chance you have trying to change others”.

I say this because too many brands – and agencies – think they can.

Worse, they think they can with an ad … an ad that either tells people specifically what to do/what they should do and/or a list of product attributes that they believe will make someone immediately stop whatever it is they have been doing for decades and change tact because they’ve suddenly been ‘enlightened’.

Of course, this is not entirely the fault of agencies and clients.

Too often, it is backed up by some for-profit research group who has said their findings prove – without any possible doubt – this is what people will do and, even more importantly, want to do.

Now this is not an anti-research stance. Or an anti-agency or client diatribe.

The reality is we need some sort of foundation of information to make choices and decisions and research – when done well, like everything in life – is a universally established way to achieve that BUT … and it’s a big but … the definitive and delusional nature of how our industry talks borders on bonkers.

I get we don’t like risk.
I get what we do is bloody expensive.
I get there are big implications on getting things wrong.

But nothing – and I mean nothing – can be guaranteed and yet so much of the business acts like it can be, conveniently choosing to ignore the landfill of failings from organisations who have researched every part of everything they do for in every aspect of their life.

Sure, it can increase the odds of success … like advertising.
Sure, it is better than not doing anything at all … like advertising.
But everyone acting like whatever they are going to do is ‘a dead cert’ is an act of commercial complicity and co-dependency that borders on Comms Stockholm Syndrome.

A long time ago, when I was maybe a bit more of a menace, a media agency told a client – with me in the room – that they could guarantee they’d HIT their sales target if a particular amount was invested.

I asked, “but you don’t know what the idea is yet and surely that has a role in the level of impact and/or investment that needs to be made?” … to which they said their ‘proprietary data’ gave them the commercial insight that helped their clients achieve their goals.

So back at the office – pissed off – I sent them an email saying this was the work.

Obviously, it did not go down well, but then neither did their ‘strategy’ of just throwing money at the wall until they hit the magic number.

Again, I appreciate we all need information to base choices and decisions on, but we’re getting way too generalistic, simplistic and egotistic in our approaches and methodologies – which is why the sooner we remember how hard it is for us to change any part of who we are, the sooner we may start accepting it takes far more than a business goal … a focus group commentary … a marketing methodology or an ad to get people to even consider doing what you want them to do and so maybe – just maybe – it will encourage us all to start playing up to a new standards rather than down to complicit convenience.

But I wouldn’t hold your breath, which is why I finish this rant with a post that I saw recently I also loved – albeit with ‘paraphrased interpretation’.

Thankfully not everyone is like this.

As proven by the fact, they tend to be the ones behind the stuff we all wish we were behind.

Or as my friend said recently, ‘they’re the ones who play to create change, not communicate everything exactly the same’.

Oh, I feel better for that. Thank you for [not] reading, hahaha.

Comments Off on We’ll All Do Better When We Stop Thinking Humans Are Robots …


Always Look Beyond The Spotlight …

This is a photo of Metallica’s road crew for their current 72 Seasons tour. I say that, but it doesn’t include the entire team who makes it happen … which totals around 500 people.

Five Hundred!

To allow 4 guys to play their songs to people around the World.

From stage riggers to wardrobe people to caterers to production crew to personal roadies to management to the 92 truck drivers.

Then there’s the people who are part of the tour but not on the tour …

From logistics people to fanclub project managers to lawyers to each and every one of the bands families.

It’s a lot.

Now the reality is the band are not just aware of this, but are deeply grateful and protective of everyone who is part of this … but the point of this post is not only does our industry love to place the spotlight on individuals – crediting them and them alone for whatever product, project or theory that is being celebrated – but too many of those individuals like to project the view that is entirely justified and as someone who has been in this industry longer than dinosaurs, the amount of times I’ve genuinely seen that, can be counted on one hand.

Don’t get me wrong, I have the ego of Bono.

And I appreciate everyone loves being told they’re good at what they do.

But there’s a difference between being celebrated and taking all the credit. And there’s a fuckload of people who – at least on social media – are happy to take all the credit.

Presenting themselves as some sort of comms Jesus.

Look, I’m not saying what they do isn’t good.

And I’m not saying what they do doesn’t have value.

However I am saying that in 99.9% of cases, they didn’t do it all on their own.

[Even though there’s more than a few you could possibly have that argument with, especially those who’ve never made work to back up their self-proclaimed genius or judgement]

Sure, maybe some of the help they received was people simply creating the conditions for them to be able to do whatever it is they do … but by the same token, ‘creating the conditions’ is exactly what those 200 people in the photo above do, and the band are very grateful they for that because otherwise no one would get to experience what is possible. Including James, Kirk, Lars and Robert.

My reason for writing this is because, as I said a few months back, too many people entering this industry are being subjected to a perspective that is inadvertently robbing them of what they could achieve if they didn’t fall into the ‘thought-leadership shortcut trap’.

That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t express their opinions and ideas.

That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be ambitious in their aspirations and goals.

But it does mean they shouldn’t think working with others is a sign of failure … because not only is that a recipe for disaster, it’s also why the industry is becoming less and less of a community and more and more an ego battlefield.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Also, today is the 1st anniversary of our dear Rosie passing.

On one hand it feels longer than that, on the other only it feels just a few weeks.

Despite being small, she’ll always have a big place in my heart and life and I’ll be thinking of her and ‘her ways’ even more today.

Miss you Rosie.

Comments Off on Always Look Beyond The Spotlight …


Why AI Says More About What You Value Than What You Can Do …

While I was in London, I saw this:

What the actual fuck?

The worst thing is I can imagine they’ll get lots of enquiries … probably from companies who are very vocal on saying ‘their staff are their greatest asset’.

But as we know, the companies that shout the loudest about their people are often the ones who are the worst offenders of them. Like some supercharged gaslighting trick, except everyone knows what they’re doing.

The bit I find confusing though is who do these companies think will be their future customers if they are shedding jobs in favor of AI?

Who is going to have the money and why the fuck do they think those who do, will spend it with them when there is a distinct lack of customer care, craft or consideration?

AI has incredible possibilities, but the scary thing is most companies like it because they see it as being able to do the same things they’ve always done, just cheaper or faster.

That’s it.

What these companies fail to realise is that if their products and operations can be replicated this easily, then they may not be that good in the first place.

I’m seeing this everywhere – especially in advertising.

Agencies and clients banging on about how they have used AI to create an ‘ad’ that would have cost millions before – without once stopping to realise that not only is it something we have seen millions of times before, but while the ad may be visually rich, it is also fucking shit.

Sure, it’s early days … but that so many people are focusing on the optimization of the technology rather than the possibilities of it is tragically sad. But then – as I’ve talked about a bunch in the past – I have always been more alarmed by the people behind the tech than the tech itself.

Maybe this is why my client – the biggest investor in luxury and street culture fashion on earth – believes the future of luxury will be built around personal service. Not the illusion of personal service … but the engagement and interaction with real humans.

Highly trained, highly experienced, specialists.

That doesn’t mean they don’t see the value and power of AI … they do. It’s just they recognize that you can’t claim value when you’re doing everything you can, on the cheap. And yet so many brands forget that … mistaking a premium price for a premium product. Until they find out by the actions, choices and behaviours of the people.

Technology is amazing and nothing is possibly more amazing than AI.

It has the power to liberate opportunities we’ve never imagined.

It can enable and facilitate whole new ways of working and creating.

It will provide an outlet for people who have been overlooked for decades.

This is all incredible and important stuff.

But if companies increasingly see it as a way to cut costs to drive short-term gains … then frankly, not only do they deserve all they will get, they need to realise they are the embodiment of Artificial Intelligence.

So to the people behind Artisan … go fuck yourself.

Said with love. Human love.

Comments Off on Why AI Says More About What You Value Than What You Can Do …