The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


Competition Versus Participation …

My 8 year old, Otis, loves Rubik’s Cubes.

LOVES THEM.

Not only that, he’s bloody good at them.

To give you an idea of how good, take a look at this …

I know he’s my son, but that’s pretty amazing.

Hell, even when he shows me how to do it – move by move – I fail, and yet he can do it blindfolded!!!

Now it’s not just him that loves cubing, it’s back in a big way. A whole subculture that is thriving and evolving.

From Youtube influencers like Cubehead – with almost a million followers on Youtube – to more types of cubes than you could ever imagine.

From heat activated.

To shape-shifting.

To digital screens.

To a whole host of customisable cubes in different sizes and shapes to increase performance for competitions … competitions, that are literally being held in every country around the world.

Hell, even Nike have just released a shoe in cube colours to connect to its growth.

This last point is particularly interesting to me because I see more and more sports brands moving away from ‘competition’ to promote participation in an attempt to connect to a generation who are walking away from physical sports.

Except they’re missing the point …

You see recently I took Otis to a speed-cubing completion in Auckland.

It was packed. Full of kids, parents and adults … all messing with cubes at different standards and speeds.

But while they were all supportive and encouraging to everyone around them, be under no mistake they were competitive. More than that, they wanted to be more competitive.

And here’s what the sports brands are getting wrong.

Kids aren’t afraid of competition, they just want to beat their own limits rather than loudly and publiclly trash someone else’s.

Of course there’s exceptions.

Of course there’s contexts and situations.

But they be in a much better position if they stopped promoting passive participation and got back to what they were always about … just understood the best victory is when you out-compete yourself.

Comments Off on Competition Versus Participation …


Behind Every Story Is A Better Story …

I love documentaries.

I mean … properly love them.

I’ve not just watched thousands of them.
I’ve not just bought thousands of them.
I’ve even flown to other countries to meet the people who have appeared in them.

From murders to video games to losing artificial limbs … you name it, I’ve seen it.

There’s so many reasons I love them, one of them being that they act as a brilliant reminder that – as my parents always told me – everyone has a story. Something that reveals who the people are and how they got to where they are. A journey of enlightenment for either the person on the screen or those watching it. And sometimes both. Now I appreciate documentaries don’t always tell the whole truth – just the perspective of the director – but even then, they tell a hell of a lot more than a lot of the stuff my industry uses for ‘insight’.

Anyway recently I watched the documentary on Netflix on the TV show, American Gladiators.

Quite frankly, I never imagined it would take me on such an emotional rollercoaster. Triggering feelings that I never expected resided in me.

I won’t ruin it for anyone, but I would urge you to watch it.

Not just because it’s a fascinating story. Not just because it acts as a reminder that behind every story are a multitude of other stories that are more personal and interesting than the ‘main event’. But also because it may explain why I value creativity more than advertising.

Because put simply, creativity finds and expresses the interesting, whereas advertising often just manufactures it.

Comments Off on Behind Every Story Is A Better Story …


I’ve Not Come This Far To Only Come This Far …

Once upon a time, there was an ad for John West – a canned food company – that said:

“It’s the fish that John West rejects that makes John West the best”.

And at our recent talk at Cannes, I quoted this from the brilliant Janis Joplin.

And yet, when I look at my industry – an industry that is quick to call out the failings of clients – we’re not really living up to that.

Now of course I appreciate we are in economically challenging times.

And I also appreciate money makes the World go round.

But the decline of our industries power and influence was going on long before this and one of the reasons was because we chased money more than standards.

Or said another way, we sold the value of creativity and cultural understanding for the illusion of importance and association.

On one hand I get it …

As an industry, we have always been paid a fraction of what some others have got, despite – arguably – doing a lot more, or at the very least, the same amount.

But our desire to be seen as a ‘corporate insider’ has destroyed our value as a ‘corporate outsider’.

Where we have the clarity to see where society is going and what they’re valuing. Where we have the objectivity to understand what are the real issues, not what companies wish them to be. Where we have the creativity to know how to connect to people in ways they may actually give a shit about.

But more and more, we are walking away from this.

Complicity is valued more than questions.
Acquiescence is valued more than a point of view.
Toxic positivity is valued more than honesty and transparency.

Now don’t get me wrong, there’s a reason for all this …

Some of our own making, some of clients making.

But for all our talk of believing in creativity … how many really are demonstrating it?

What makes it worse is the creative talent out there is arguably better than at any point in our history.

And that’s why this is not some ‘rose-tinted-looking-backwards’ bullshit – especially as there was a whole host of shit that went on back then – this is a ‘what the hell do we value’ rant.

Once upon a time I was having a bit of a hard time at work.

A lot of it was because of the issues I’ve just written.

I went home and told Jill what was going on and what I was being told when I asked questions … to which she said something that has stuck with me.

“There’s always a reason why they’re not going to do something”.

She was right.

She still is.

Despite being in the incredibly fortunate position to work with highly successful creative people who reside outside of this industry, I still love this industry.

More than that, I still believe in what this industry can do and create.

Hell, it has given me a life that is beyond anything I could have ever imagined for myself.

In fact, almost everything that is in my life is because of what

But right now it seems we’re better at talking good things than doing good things.

And so when things get worse – not just for us, but those who use/dictate to us – we better not complain about who is eating our lunch, because quite frankly, we are doing it, and have been doing it, to ourselves.

Making decisions of convenience not of standards and excitement.

A circle jerk of blinkered and blind complicity.

The good news not everyone is like this.

The even better news is it’s not too late for us all to change.

But the muscle memory may be too old for some to remember. Or worse, care.

Don’t let the financial crisis be another excuse for apathy. That didn’t get us in this mess.

We did.

We all did.

Comments Off on I’ve Not Come This Far To Only Come This Far …


I Know Correlation Does Not Mean Causation But …

… but I love this chart.

Like all good conspiracy theories, there’s definitely enough to make you think it could be true. And it could be. Maybe not entirely, but definitely an influence … because the smartphone has become the modern day cigarette … where any moment of pause is a moment to scroll and I can’t think of any moment of pause like queuing up at a supermarket till.

I love this sort of thing.

Yes, I appreciate some are utter bollocks, but when they hit – they really hit.

Like the guy I met who started a TV shopping channel … who told me his goal was to ensure his channels were never anymore than 3 channels aways from sports, because he knew during breaks in the game, men would flick up or down 3 channels from where they were. He then ensured the products being sold during these times were sport/male relevant, which he said gave him a disproportionate opportunity to drive incremental sales.

Was he right?

He thought he was … and given he became a billionaire, there’s a good reason to believe him. Or at least not dismiss him out of hand.

Insight is getting a bad reputation these days. I get it … a lot of what is passed for insight, isn’t. Plus there’s rarely one insight that drives the whole business and it’s very rare to find something unique that others can’t claim. [Though there’s always the option to use them in a way that’s different to how others have interpreted them … which far too often, is literal translation]

But that doesn’t mean we should just dismiss the value of them … because when you do find them, the impact they can have on understanding or igniting a creative point of view is far more powerful than all the eco-systems, models and processes put together.

So here’s to the insight.

Rare, but worth pursuing or at the very least, remain open to them …

As long as you don’t fall for intellectual fiction or conveneient generalisation.

Comments Off on I Know Correlation Does Not Mean Causation But …


When You Try To Hard Not To Show What You’re Afraid Of …

So recently I saw this from Tiffany …

It costs US$3500.

Now don’t get me wrong, I appreciate Tiffany are trying to shed the ‘Breakfast At Tiffany’s’ stereotype … and I’m all for brands exploring and experimenting … but this feels so wrong.

An attempt to be cool without understanding what is cool.

The equivalent of a Goldman Sachs CEO thinking they’re a DJ and because they’re rich, people just nod at them. Oh yes, we have that too don’t we. Ha.

The problem classic luxury brands have is its street culture driving the luxury category – especially in fashion – not the other way around and most definitely not in this sort of overt and contrived way.

Sure some classic luxury brands have managed to do this, but they’ve done it with more deliberate, committed and authentic acts and associations, not just some random drops in scale categories.

Will the Tiffany ball sell?

Of course and some will say that’s all that matters … but the real question is at what cost?

It all feels like Ducati a few years ago when they sold their name to everything. Including a USB drive.

Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate a fast USB transfer rate as much as the next sad bastard, but the only thing a Ducati USB said about you was you were a next level twat.

I remember interviewing Ducati owners to ask them their opinion and the people I talked to, hated it. As one rider said to me [and I’m paraphrasing as it was a long time ago] … while the brand marketing people probably thought this was a way for fans to express their loyalty, Ducati owners thought it was a way to cheapen the value of their investment.

Or said another way, winning over a new generation who only associate with the superficial while alienating those who appreciate the craft.

Now I get the Tiffany situation is slightly different – because they were getting seriously weighed down with their age – but we’re seeing this sort of thing everywhere at the moment.

Attempts at quick wins.

Superficial not substance.

Misunderstanding the difference between being needed and looking like the one in need.

Where brands – and based on something that happened this week, also people – think having what they call ‘an asset’ means they can do whatever they want with whoever they want.

It’s a new level of brand arrogance.

The era of Trump brand [mis]management.

Which means if can only be a matter of time before we see the Tiffany x Wish collab.

Oh … and before I forget, today is Sir Dr Brian May [CBE] birthday.

For a guitarist in one of the biggest selling rock bands of all time, he’s done alright hasn’t he.

Happy birthday Mr May, you’re a legend to me and countless others.

Comments Off on When You Try To Hard Not To Show What You’re Afraid Of …