The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


Groundhog Day Was A Documentary …

A few weeks ago, I was writing the Colenso strat gang plan for 2026.

What we want to do.
What we want to change.
What we want to break.
What we want to create.

In doing that, I wanted to reference what we had experienced in 2025 against what mates at other agencies around the World had gone through. Not to compare necessarily, more to understand their perspective of what was happening.

Now, despite the fact I have a reputation for never being satisfied, I knew we’d had a pretty good year.

Not maybe by the measure others value, but by a lot of things I do.

Of course there’s things we can, should and need to improve – and we will – but overall, we’d built a foundation of interesting things that was good by any criteria.

Or so I thought …

You see, I spoke to a friend of mine in the US and when I told them some of the stuff we’d done, they kept saying …

“How did you make that much stuff?”

At first I thought they were either being kind or mistakenly believed that because NZ is so small, it’s impossible for the entire industry to produce more than one thing a year … but that wasn’t it at all.

Despite them working in America.
Despite them working in a big agency.
Despite them working on a massive client.
They’d produced nothing.

Nada.
Zero.
Zilch.

Actually, that’s not quite right … because they did tell me they had produced something.

In fact over 60 somethings …

Presentation decks.
For the same idea.
Which the client still didn’t buy.

Now you may assume with that many presentations, my friend is a fucking idiot. But you’d be wrong because she’s utterly brilliant. But – as I’ve written before – this is where we’re at these days. Endless presentations to endless people in endless departments just to get the smallest bit of work through.

But as mad as that is, it’s not as mad as this …

Despite no one making much work, they told me how everyone is as busy-as-fuck.

“Doing what?” I asked.

“I don’t know. I think they’re just creating, shuffling or editing papers”.

Now I’m not saying we’re immune from writing the odd needless presentation at Colenso …

Nor am I saying we’ve not beem asked to present the same deck to different ‘stakeholders’ within the same organisation a multitude of times over the years …

And if the reason for it is because the client spotted or questioned things in the agencies thinking that the agency hadn’t so they had to go back and keep updating it to re-present it … I get it.

But over 60 times?

For the same campaign?

That never moved forward?

If that’s the case, either the client is bad or the agency is.

Who is paying for this shit? Why are we letting this happen? It’s not just utterly inefficient, it’s utterly soul-destroying.

Worse, it also is completely destroying the value, reputation, purpose of our entire industry.

I get consultancies can operate this way – because ultimately, they get paid to offer advice rather than apply it – but we are an industry made for making, creating and doing.

That we are often positioned by business and procurement departments as ‘costly and unprofessional’ while they happily pay salaries to whole departments who never move anything forward or to consultancies who never take any responsibility blows my mind.

So while hearing the situation my friend found themselves could have made me look at the things we achieved in ’25 with a slightly more positive gaze, it served more as a cautionary tale. Because what we’re seeing is the marketing industry potentially turning more and more into the worst of the legal industry … where the goal isn’t to get the right result, but to keep the problem going.

Not because – as is the case with law – it keeps the money rolling in.

But because it keeps mediocrity feeling important and looking busy.

Hell, with this news, I may be nicer to my clients and colleagues from now on.

Emphasis on ‘may’. Hahaha.

Comments Off on Groundhog Day Was A Documentary …


If You’re Not Willing To Put Yourself Out There, Why Do You Think People Will Believe You’ll Go Out Of Your Way To Help Them Succeed?

It’s March. Bloody March.

And it’s also Monday. How much change can one person deal with?!

Anyway, when I was young, I had 3 ways to be sociable.

1. Go outside and see who was there.

2. Go to a friends house and knock on their door.

3. Ring my friends house and see if they were in.

That. Was. It.

And you know what … I did the second one most of all.

Didn’t matter what day it was.
Didn’t matter what time it was [as long as it wasn’t at ‘dinner time’ and/or after 8pm]
Didn’t even matter where they lived. I did it … and so did every other kid I knew.

And it’s because of this, we were OK with whatever the outcome was … mainly because we went with hope rather than expectation. So even if they were in but weren’t allowed out, you’d of had some sort of physical interaction to work out where you stood.

I say this because someone recently sent me this …

… and I wondered if people even know how to do this anymore, let alone do it anymore?

Yes, I know you only have to like an update on Linkedin to get some fucker sending you an unsolicited message … but I’m not talking about those pricks, I’m talking about people who put themselves out there and engage someone in person, rather than hide behind emails, text messages or DM’s?

Maybe you think that because my generation are the last who HAD to do this, we’d still be OK with doing this … but truth be told, if someone so much as knocks on our door unannounced – be it friends or family – most of us would have to be physically restrained from calling the Police on their ass.

On one level, I get it … why put yourself in a position of awkwardness when you can find other ways to do it that are less confronting or confrontational. Except by outsourcing our interest to technology – or an intermediary – we lose something.

A way to show the other person matters.
A way to show you’ve really thought about what you want to say or do.
A way to show you’re willing to fail to say something you hope they’ll value.

I have a client who only deals in the face-to-face.

Sure, you can make an appointment to see him, but his attitude is if someone goes out of their way to come and see him, they’re worth more than those who only engage behind tech.

Even more so, if they only engage when they ‘want something’ – albeit wrapped up in the claims of ‘opportunity’.

Sure, it’s pretty old school, and he’s pretty old … though to be fair, the artists I work for also want their core team present for the big meetings rather than be on zoom etc – but that’s not why he does it [and I assume why they don’t either] because for him it’s all about trust and respect. By that I mean ‘earning it’ and ‘proving it’.

And maybe that’s the biggest difference between then and now.

Because back then, you knew you had to earn the right to have a chance of letting good happen. Now, too many expect it.

Comments Off on If You’re Not Willing To Put Yourself Out There, Why Do You Think People Will Believe You’ll Go Out Of Your Way To Help Them Succeed?


Corporate Gaslighting Inflation …
February 27, 2026, 6:15 am
Filed under: A Bit Of Inspiration, Attitude & Aptitude, Comment, Management, Social Media

Speak No Evil, See No Evil, Hear No Evil

A few weeks ago, on one of the social media platforms, I wrote the word ‘idiot’ in a comment.

It was a statement about something I’d done but it triggered the platform to immediately put up a message – prior to them posting – that basically saying:

“Are you sure you want to do this? It could be read as offensive”.

On one hand I appreciate it the caution.

On the other, I find it amazing they are so focused on policing their users language but don’t hold themselves to the same standards.

Let’s be honest, most of them fall far below that behaviour on a daily basis …

From the ability to manipulate images in the most offensive and gratuitous way possible to the harassment of women – and that’s before we even get to the corporate behaviour of many of these companies – social media platforms seem to think they can divert our attention from their massive moments of self-interest, profit-motivated behaviours by executing some automated, minimum standard, ‘standards management’.

Nothing sums this up more than the ban of social media for kids up until the age of 16 in Australia.

While this was not instigated by the platforms, many jumped on it to demonstrate their support.

Was it because they mean it?

Errrrrm, almost definitely not … the driving force behind their ‘compassion’ was the fear of what may happen if they didn’t support it.

And they’d be right to think that, because the real question we should be asking is ‘why do we have to save our kids from social media when the real solution would be to hold social media companies to account to help protect our kids?

Of course parents have a responsibility in all this. A big one.

But if you think social media companies are exempt from any of the blame is insane and if you want to know why, listen to this.

Warning: It is extremely triggering, but very important.

Comments Off on Corporate Gaslighting Inflation …


Did The Titanic Sink Because Of An Iceberg Or Because Of Too Much Middle Management?

There’s a company I work with that has 14 employees.

Of that 14, 4 are specialists and the remaining 10 are very smart, informed, experienced, generalists.

And they make US$100 million dollars a year.

PER YEAR.

Part of the reason they make so much money is the speed in which they make decisions.

Sure, with only 14 people, it’s much easier to achieve that … but that’s not the whole story behind their success.

Because while all their competitors employ 5+ times the amount of people as them [even though their revenues are a fraction of theirs] the driving force behind their speed is down to 3 things.

1 They understand who they are, what they believe and what they do.
2 They only hire truly exceptional talent with experience proven over years.
3 They trust their team so they can make decisions with minimal consultation or debate.

Or put even more simply:

Opportunities don’t get delayed, diluted, dismantled or discarded by ‘heirarchy management’.

And the result of this trust, taste and experience?

They’re not only regarded as one of the most influential and highly regarded companies in their field across the entire World … they’re viewed as being the most successful company in the history of their category.

Hopefully it is obvious why I say this …

But if it’s not, this quote from Dave Trott – I think – sums it up.

I have to be honest, I can relate to this … and what makes this even worse is I’m one of the lucky fuckers, because I generally only work – and have only worked – with clients and colleagues who have the taste, experience and ambition to do what it takes to create good, interesting and original shit day after day after day.

Which begs the question, what the hell is it like for so many others?

I swear the problem is too many companies care more about building empires than producing excellence.

Where the prize is quantity not quality.

Size rather than craft.

KPI’s over creating real change.

Pride in conformity rathe than standards.

And so we end up in this situation where we have countless levels of middle management … where each one dilutes whatever is in front of them to ensure they don’t risk being negatively judged by the level above.

Empowered to only ever say no and never yes.

Resulting in opportunities being killed by either a thousand comments or delayed by a thousand meetings.

Which is why productivity has little to do with which operational model you embrace.

Nor does it matter if you operate with a flat-org structure or an agile approach …

If you want to be killer rather than filler, collapse the layers and elevate proper talent.

No wonder the brilliant Simon Pestridge once told me:

“Middle management want to be right …

… but [good] senior management want to know how to be better”

Comments Off on Did The Titanic Sink Because Of An Iceberg Or Because Of Too Much Middle Management?


Hidden Behind Hair …
February 25, 2026, 6:15 am
Filed under: 2026, A Bit Of Inspiration, AI, Colenso, Comment, Family, Jill

Yesterday I wrote a post overflowing with love for my son and my desire to alway be there for him, even when I’m not.

Today, I am ensuring he can’t wait for me to get on with buggering off. Probably.

You see, I’ve had a beard of sorts for as long as I can remember … even before I didn’t have hair on the top of my head.

In fact the only time I’ve properly shaved was about 15 years ago when Jill wondered what I looked like without it.

Well she found out … and the answer was, I looked like a child.

We have never mentioned it again …

Anyway, recently my social media has been filled with clips of people who shaved their beards off their face to see how their family would react. Unsurprisingly, it wasn’t great. Not because – as was the case with me – they didn’t look good, but because they just looked so different.

Kids cried.
Partners trembled.
Animals growled and barked.

Now you’d think with that reaction, the idea of me even considering doing it again would never cross my mind … but it did. Fortunately, for me though, was rather than do it for real, I could turn to AI.

So I did, and this is what I look like …

Look at me!

LOOK. AT. ME!!!

Jesus Christ, I look like a fucking sex-pest.

Seriously, if I shaved and found myself looking like that, I think I’d voluntarily hand myself into the Police. Not because I’d have done anything but because I’d assume the Police would just arrest me for how I look.

And if you think I’m being hard on myself, imagine how my wonderful colleague, Gi, must be feeling given that’s kinda-how he looks every day.

Fortunately for him, he’s a much nicer, smarter and taller version than me … which means he can walk the streets without fear of arrest while also being completely safe in the knowledge I’ll never, ever shave, so he will never have to worry of being mistaken for me.

Consider that my gift to you Gi. And humanity at large.

Comments Off on Hidden Behind Hair …