A Dictatorship Is Not A Community …
October 2, 2020, 7:30 am
Filed under:
Attitude & Aptitude,
Brand Suicide,
Comment,
Corporate Gaslighting,
Culture,
Fake Attitude,
Linkedin,
Management,
Marketing,
Marketing Fail,
Prejudice,
Technology 
Over the past few weeks, I’ve had 2 very unpleasant interactions with LinkedIn.
The first was when I discovered my personal account had been blocked by them.
No warning.
No reason.
Just blocked.
I had to look on Google to find out how I could get in contact with them, and after discovering that I had to submit proof of my ID – they got back to me to say that someone had found a post I’d written offensive due to it’s adult content … and as they felt it contravened some LinkedIn policy I’d never heard of, they needed me to apologise to them before they would reinstate me.
Now I appreciate the image I chose was provocative, however it was not just for shock value … it was part of a presentation/post I was giving about the terrible, sexist, bullying behaviour men subject women to in the work place every single day – so I found it remarkable they ignored the context – which was clear – and just banned me and demanded an apology.
I told them I refused to apologise because it’s a genuine presentation about a genuine issue … however, as they appeared to be OK with that sort of behaviour, I would report them to the workplace commission for equal rights as well as the #MeToo organisation.
Unsuprisingly they reinstated my account saying ‘they appreciate I wasn’t trying to be offensive’, despite having previously said they agreed with whoever complained about my post and – contrary to most legal protocols – regarded me guilty, even though they had not sought any information or context about the post from the person being accused.
But pathetic and annoying but that was nothing compared to what was yet to come.
So a week later – which seems a very strange coincidence – the Corporate Gaslighting LinkedIn account was banned.
Again no warning. No explanation. Just banned.
So I went through the same thing and then they got back to me with this …
Yep, the issue is simply the account is under Corporate Gaslighting’s name rather than my own – despite all contact details are.
But here’s where it gets even more annoying.
“Due to the nature of this account, we won’t be able to remove the restriction and/or merge this account with another one.”
That’s right.
It’s blocked. Forever.
Not because they couldn’t link it to my account but because they didn’t want to. Because of the ‘nature’ of the account.
And this is where I’m confused because surely the nature of the account is perfect for LinkedIn?
In fact, when I read the LinkedIn ‘purpose’, which states:
‘Connect the world’s professionals to make them more productive and successful’
… then I can’t think of a more perfect partner for LinkedIn.
But no. They don’t want it.
It’s fine to have shady recruiters taking money from their clients to spam anyone they can get to. It’s fine to have men use their site to hit on women. It’s fine to pretend you’re a z-grade shrink with a guaranteed answer to everything you could ever wish for. It’s fine to allow ‘members’ to spout blatant lies about their achievements or sales tools. It’s fine to have people use the platform to talk about the conformity of professional appearance … but it’s not OK to have someone who is dedicated to helping professionals being systematically undermined by bad leaders, because the way I filled in their form is a violation of the LinkedIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.
I’ll tell you what’s a violation – LinkedIn’s claims they are a community. That they want to help people succeed. That they want to connect people together.
LinkedIn wants everyone to follow their orders. What they have decided is right. What works in their best interests. And if for some reason that doesn’t happen, then they let their god complex run riot – before hiding behind anonymous people and policies that don’t allow for context or conversation … just a brazen and contrived ‘computer says no’ guilty verdict, with all the humanity and consideration of an ATM machine.
Dear LinkedIn. You are in danger of becoming the absolute opposite of what you claim to be about, because if you were, you’d have created your own version of Corporate Gaslighting, but no, you’d rather just ban it. But then, when you’re paying your CEO almost $14,000,000 per year, I appreciate the last thing you’d ever want to do is to take any sort of stand against any sort of professional misconduct, for fear of alienating the companies who allow your CEO to be paid such an obscene amount.
Linkedin has incredible potential to be a real force for good.
Not just for corporations, but employees too.
It could influence real, positive change.
It could drive shifts in values, attitudes and rewards.
It could challenge the rules of what ‘professionalism’ supposedly means and looks like in the modern age.
It could help shape the future of work in ways that benefit all.
And while some could say they are doing this in their own way, the past few weeks have suggested to me their focus is on keeping the C-Suite happy rather than helping people create a new version of the C-Suite.
It’s a shame, because the whole industry is begging for some sort of major change but instead, they not only prefer to keep things exactly the same … they are using their power to ensure it does.
If you – or someone you know – are having your confidence systematically undermined, by colleagues … you are not alone. There is help out there. Not at Linkedin.com but at TheyTriedToKillMeButI.Live
Close, Even When They’re Gone …
When we were getting ready to move to our new house, we prepared for the big day by going through cupboards to help the removal guys with the packing.
In one of these cupboards we found some of Mum’s belongings that I’d not seen since she died in 2015.
One of the items in there was her handbag and one of the items in it was this necklace.
To give you an idea of how important it is, I can’t remember a time Mum wasn’t wearing it.
I certainly can’t find a photograph without her having it on.
So to see it again, after so long, felt like a wonderful, wonderful gift.
But there was something even more impactful than that and it was the smell of her handbag.
Because we had placed it inside a box, it still had the gentle, sweet fragrance of my dear Mum’s perfume on it.
A smell I thought I would never experience again.
Without any overstatement, I can honestly tell you it took my breath away … and as I held it tight, tight, tight against my chest … it felt like I was getting a final hug from her.
It was something I had wanted for each day since she passed … and while it let out a flood of emotions and tears, it was such a wonderful feeling.
Moving house – even after all the moves I’ve done – is a pain in the ass.
But occasionally, it is a gift.
Not just for where you’re going to, but for what it makes sure you don’t forget.
Thank you Mum. For everything.
Rx
Filed under: Attitude & Aptitude, Brand Suicide, Comment, Corporate Gaslighting, Culture, Fake Attitude, Linkedin, Management, Marketing, Marketing Fail, Prejudice, Technology
Over the past few weeks, I’ve had 2 very unpleasant interactions with LinkedIn.
The first was when I discovered my personal account had been blocked by them.
No warning.
No reason.
Just blocked.
I had to look on Google to find out how I could get in contact with them, and after discovering that I had to submit proof of my ID – they got back to me to say that someone had found a post I’d written offensive due to it’s adult content … and as they felt it contravened some LinkedIn policy I’d never heard of, they needed me to apologise to them before they would reinstate me.
Now I appreciate the image I chose was provocative, however it was not just for shock value … it was part of a presentation/post I was giving about the terrible, sexist, bullying behaviour men subject women to in the work place every single day – so I found it remarkable they ignored the context – which was clear – and just banned me and demanded an apology.
I told them I refused to apologise because it’s a genuine presentation about a genuine issue … however, as they appeared to be OK with that sort of behaviour, I would report them to the workplace commission for equal rights as well as the #MeToo organisation.
Unsuprisingly they reinstated my account saying ‘they appreciate I wasn’t trying to be offensive’, despite having previously said they agreed with whoever complained about my post and – contrary to most legal protocols – regarded me guilty, even though they had not sought any information or context about the post from the person being accused.
But pathetic and annoying but that was nothing compared to what was yet to come.
So a week later – which seems a very strange coincidence – the Corporate Gaslighting LinkedIn account was banned.
Again no warning. No explanation. Just banned.
So I went through the same thing and then they got back to me with this …
Yep, the issue is simply the account is under Corporate Gaslighting’s name rather than my own – despite all contact details are.
But here’s where it gets even more annoying.
“Due to the nature of this account, we won’t be able to remove the restriction and/or merge this account with another one.”
That’s right.
It’s blocked. Forever.
Not because they couldn’t link it to my account but because they didn’t want to. Because of the ‘nature’ of the account.
And this is where I’m confused because surely the nature of the account is perfect for LinkedIn?
In fact, when I read the LinkedIn ‘purpose’, which states:
‘Connect the world’s professionals to make them more productive and successful’
… then I can’t think of a more perfect partner for LinkedIn.
But no. They don’t want it.
It’s fine to have shady recruiters taking money from their clients to spam anyone they can get to. It’s fine to have men use their site to hit on women. It’s fine to pretend you’re a z-grade shrink with a guaranteed answer to everything you could ever wish for. It’s fine to allow ‘members’ to spout blatant lies about their achievements or sales tools. It’s fine to have people use the platform to talk about the conformity of professional appearance … but it’s not OK to have someone who is dedicated to helping professionals being systematically undermined by bad leaders, because the way I filled in their form is a violation of the LinkedIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies.
I’ll tell you what’s a violation – LinkedIn’s claims they are a community. That they want to help people succeed. That they want to connect people together.
LinkedIn wants everyone to follow their orders. What they have decided is right. What works in their best interests. And if for some reason that doesn’t happen, then they let their god complex run riot – before hiding behind anonymous people and policies that don’t allow for context or conversation … just a brazen and contrived ‘computer says no’ guilty verdict, with all the humanity and consideration of an ATM machine.
Dear LinkedIn. You are in danger of becoming the absolute opposite of what you claim to be about, because if you were, you’d have created your own version of Corporate Gaslighting, but no, you’d rather just ban it. But then, when you’re paying your CEO almost $14,000,000 per year, I appreciate the last thing you’d ever want to do is to take any sort of stand against any sort of professional misconduct, for fear of alienating the companies who allow your CEO to be paid such an obscene amount.
Linkedin has incredible potential to be a real force for good.
Not just for corporations, but employees too.
It could influence real, positive change.
It could drive shifts in values, attitudes and rewards.
It could challenge the rules of what ‘professionalism’ supposedly means and looks like in the modern age.
It could help shape the future of work in ways that benefit all.
And while some could say they are doing this in their own way, the past few weeks have suggested to me their focus is on keeping the C-Suite happy rather than helping people create a new version of the C-Suite.
It’s a shame, because the whole industry is begging for some sort of major change but instead, they not only prefer to keep things exactly the same … they are using their power to ensure it does.
If you – or someone you know – are having your confidence systematically undermined, by colleagues … you are not alone. There is help out there. Not at Linkedin.com but at TheyTriedToKillMeButI.Live