The Musings Of An Opinionated Sod [Help Me Grow!]


Service Vs Security …
August 4, 2011, 6:20 am
Filed under: Comment


Photo by Eric & Amy Hodges.

So I was in the UK last week and had a couple of hours to go shopping along Oxford Street.

Despite being one of the busiest – and most famous – shopping streets in the World, I was shocked at how bad the actual shopping experience was.

Now I know high-street retailers are being bashed around by the tough economic conditions – not to mention the rise of internet shopping – however the way they are presenting themselves to the public leads me to believe they are doing more than their fair-share in ensuring their demise, rather than their growth.

Two things that really shocked me was their layout and their service policies.

Store after store looked like it had been downsized while trying to keep stock levels the same.

What this resulted in was a cluttered store that did all it could to dis-encourage any customer browsing. What’s worse is that if you were in a clothing store and found something you wanted to try, you were faced with dirty, cluttered ‘changing rooms’ that did all they could to make you turn back, rather than try on.

Seriously, I walked into one where there were 17 coat hangers strewn across the floor.

SEVENTEEN.

And when I went into the cubicle next door, I found the mirror broken and the door wouldn’t lock.

This was not the sort of store you’d expect me to shop at [ie: Everything For A Pound], it was a well known, semi-up market, mainstream fashion brand.

Which led to the second major issue.

Staff.

In short, there was hardly any around.

You could sense that companies had downsized their people as well as their stores to save on cash – but what this led to was a bunch of people who were unhelpful and unavailable to shoppers, either because they were too stressed out with the countless other jobs they had to do to or just had stopped caring.

But there was one area where companies had seemingly invested a lot.

Security guards.

Seriously, they were everywhere.

Millions of them, all talking into their little walkie-talkies and guarding the doors against shoppers who seemed to be spending more time walking out than buying. Unless they were a tourist, because they seemed to not care as long as they could go home with a TopShop or Harrods bag.

Now you might imagine that this situation would be even worse in places like Asia – but you’d be wrong.

Sure labour is cheap, but that hasn’t stopped companies instilling strict standards of shopping environment experience.

Stores are clean, open and well stocked.

Changing rooms are clean, well lit, with staff on hand to help.

And the overall sales assistant approach is one of being genuinely helpful, rather than bitter or busy.

Of course there are exceptions – just like there are in the UK – except in Asia, the exception is a bad experience whereas on Oxford Street, it’s a good one.

Maybe you will disagree with me, but I couldn’t help feeling the high street retailers on one of London’s, not to mention the World’s, busiest streets are focused more on stopping money walk out the door – either in terms of staff, space and security – than approaching things from the perspective of encouraging more people to come in and spend more money … and while I appreciate companies need to be prudent managing their money, downsizing the shopper experience is not going to help in the long-term when ultimately, like live concerts, that can be the thing that draws millions of people out and creates an experience that’s as addictive as it is – if done well – profitable.


57 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Wait, you went in to a clothing store?

Comment by DH

It was an accident. For me and them.

Comment by Rob

Oxford Street is to be avoided at all costs, but it’s true that service in the UK is generally abysmal and defensive.

It’s some sort of cultural disdain for the idea of serving – a disdain that permeates the shop-floor and corporate management. I’ve always thought the contrast with the US on this score was down to the fact that most americans have had service jobs because of the tradition of working through education. Maybe that applies in Asia too.

On the other hand, CCTV probably identified you as you approached and shop staff were herded into a safe room and the security threat level was raised to substantial .

Comment by John

To John’s point, do you (Rob or George) still have that study on service attitude differences between British store assistants and French? You showed it to me when I first started with you guys and it was fascinating.

Comment by Pete

The difference in national attitudes to complaining effectively (as opposed to moaning over coffee) are also relevant.

Comment by John

Good point. Reminds me of a quote I saw in a Michael Moore movie where they said the French Government were afraid of the population so were conscious of doing the right thing by them but the American people were frightened of their Government so accepted whatever was handed to them. Oxford Street retailers appear to think they live in the White House and as no one in England knows how to complain well, they carry on regardless.

Comment by Pete

Though the continual downturn or revenue at their stores should inform retailers that shoppers are complaining with their wallets not their voices.

Comment by Pete

Should, but doesn’t. Also you assume that people don’t return to places where they get bad service. They shouldn’t, but they do.

Comment by John

He’s right Pete, we still come on this blog don’t we.

Comment by Billy Whizz

Sorry John, can I just confirm you are agreeing with me?

Comment by Rob

Counting cards I can understand, but counting coat-hangers…

Comment by John

I haven’t been shopping in the UK for a long, long time but the situation you describe sounds similar to what is starting to happening in the US, though maybe not in the key tourist shopping locations.

When you say the emphasis seems to be “stopping money go out the door”, I’m assuming you mean minimising loss of revenue as opposed to maximising sales. I don’t know if that’s strictly true, and I know it was you musing out loud rather than stating a fact, but based on what you describe I can understand how you got to that view.

Regardless, this is a great read and makes you wonder what the priorities of high street retailers really is and what it should be.

Comment by Pete

Wait. You went in to a clothing store?

Comment by DH

Blame the RSI

Comment by John

Can you get RSI in the mouth? If you think he blogs a lot you should be in a conversation with him.

Comment by DH

Hang on, you did didn’t you. My thoughts are with you John.

Comment by DH

Listening is optional.

Comment by John

Wise.

Comment by DH

Wait. You wrote a post that we’re not trashing?

Comment by John

Andy’s not commented yet.

Comment by DH

i fucking have now and ive saved you from all turning into a bunch of sycofuckingphantic asses.

Comment by andy@cynic

Great post Robert. I had the misfortune to be on Oxford St not so long ago and saw exactly what you describe. The difference being I failed to pull the various strands of visual information together to allow me to come to the view and conclusion that makes this post so good and informative.
Pete. Rob has the film you mention. It’s about the differences between English/French waiters and store assistants. I’m sure he still has it, he keeps everything.

Comment by George

I do have it, but it’s on VHS video which means no one can possibly ever watch it again!

Comment by Rob

isnt having a vhs tape of any fucking sort against your tech ethical code? what the fuck is happening to you, have you no fucking shame?

Comment by andy@cynic

Wait. It took two people to take that photo?

Comment by John

One to take the photo, one to smash up the store.

Comment by Billy Whizz

Dubai seems to be thinking along the lines of Asia in the sense of creating top service.

However there was this scene at one of the well known malls, I keep seeing that (yes from a very Western point of view, but in my defense, the western/expat peeps are who they cater most to) made me quite uncomfortable, while it was to achieve the opposite..

There was this man, who was in charge of cleaning a piece of shopping mall floor. Every time people walked over it. a couple of meters, somebody walks over it, he’d clean it.

This was his job. Just like some other guy was charged with another piece of mall floor. and around the entire mall this went. people walk, they’d clean.

Now I don’t know the man’s background and for all I know he’d tell me to fuck off because he is making more than wherever he came from, still….

I could not help feel that this overacting of ‘service’ on the part of the mall owners showed a total lack of understanding with regards to service is and should be as much as the UK Highstreet shops think they can get away with under serving. A “why? because I can” situation.

without some nuance, context and understanding service is just an seller’s act, not a buyer experience..

at least to me.

Comment by niko

That’s not an uncommon scene from when I lived in Singapore. I agree with what you’re saying but then I also remember everytime I had visitors and we went to a mall, the first thing they’d say is how clean and spotless it was and how it was so different to “back home”.

I’m sure there’s a better balance they could reach but with labour so cheap, it might not be something the mall owners care about.

Comment by Pete

Same with the airports. They gleam more than a Princesses castle in a Disney movie!

Comment by Rob

As for store layout, that’s a whole other post (http://makemarketinghistory.blogspot.com/2008/08/nokia-store-update.html) and it’s a huge missed opportunity, be it the directed path of IKEA stores or the placing of basic items in inconvenient parts of a supermarket in the belief that you’ll buy other stuff on the way past – a belief that overlooks the impact of frustration on willingness to buy. Again it’s all about maximising (selling) rather than pull (ease of purchase).

Comment by John

Corrected version:

As for store layout, that’s a whole other post (http://makemarketinghistory.blogspot.com/2008/08/nokia-store-update.html) and it’s a huge missed opportunity, be it the directed path of IKEA stores or the placing of basic items in inconvenient parts of a supermarket in the belief that you’ll buy other stuff on the way past – a belief that overlooks the impact of frustration on willingness to buy. Again it’s all about maximising push (selling) rather than pull (ease of purchase).

Comment by John

what the fuck is going on here then? nice comments. on fucking tangent comments. added commentary to the fucking on tangent comments. and then dodds writes the same fucking comment twice and includes his fucking own blog on it because after 400 years, campbell may have written something bordering on decent. except its all bollocks because youve all fucking failed to notice the one thing that proves campbell is talking shite. he doesnt go in to any shop unless they sell technology tat so unless baz has got apple to make the ishirt, the only place hed of walked in to is hmv and i doubt that fucking place is still around.

havent you learnt anyfuckingthing from me over the years?

Comment by andy@cynic

What Andy said. Good night.

Comment by John

I also suspect that, as with so many of these issues, it’s down to senior management buying into something that looks good on paper without imagining walking through it in the shoes and eyes of the customer.

Comment by John

look at yourself dodds. look at yourself. what the fuck do you think you are doing. stop being sucked in to campbells trap. youve already failed in the past week, dont do it afuckingain.

Comment by andy@cynic

Are there a pair of birkies in that photo? Behind the single stiletto? You took that photo really didn’t you Rob.

Comment by DH

He does lurk in the womens section.

Comment by Billy Whizz

That everyone (bar Andy) is keeping this post on track with is testimony to the quality of this post. The service vs security staff ratio is very interesting and I’d love to see if there is any data showing whether Robert’s observation is accurate and whether this has shifted over the past decade. I will ask our retail director whether they have any stats and pass on any findings I get. This is a great and thought provoking post.

Comment by Bazza

you mean im the only fucker keeping it real. as per fucking usual.

Comment by andy@cynic

Baz, please let me know if you obtain relevant data. It’s an interesting premise which I will ask my team to investigate as well. Good post Robert.

Comment by Lee Hill

I should point out it that this was only how it felt – I am not saying it is an accurate observation of the state of all high-street shops. Saying that, if there is any information available, I’d put money on it showing the ratio between sales staff and security staff has got much closer over the past few years, for both the points I raise in this post and a bunch of external economic conditions and situations that has led to people being more willing to take lower paying jobs or working beyond retirement age.

Just a hunch …

Comment by Rob

dont you try and worm your fucking way out of it campbell, be a fucking man. oh you cant can you. pussy.

Comment by andy@cynic

On the subject of retail and Oxford Street in particular, will you please tell NIke to sort out fucking NikeTown. It’s a bloody fucking maze. I know retail is all about dwell time but believe me, hiding the stairs and trapping me in the second floor for 10 minutes will not make me buy more trainers. I walked past the bastard basketball section at least 4 times. I hate basketball almost as much as hate media agencies

Comment by northern

Dwell time? Is that what they call it? Morons. It runs counter to the underlying culture of accelerated living and it’s only dwelling if it’s at the behest of the individual – if not, it’s simply delay and obstruction.

Comment by John

I think you should be addressing that comment to a Mr Graeme Douglas. I’m sure you have his details.

Comment by Rob

what the fuck is dwell time? which fuckwit came up with that bollocks? a major fucking kicking is needed and i want to be first in the fucking queue. wankers. fucking, fucking wankers.

Comment by andy@cynic

No, no, no. Leave the shopper marketing to me. Unleash hell on Nike’s store designers.

Comment by northern

I meant leave the shopper markeTERS. Shopper marketing is only one small step above telesales as a pastime for vermin.

Comment by northern

would it be easier just to kill a few fuckers?

Comment by andy@cynic

in the same way planners are only 1 step up from a shit stained lav at a highway kfc at 3am?

Comment by andy@cynic

Amazing how many brands refer to Oxford Street as their flagship store when they are anything but.
Having gone shopping in HK and a little in China even the smaller stores were well kept.

I did have a good experience talking to a security guard at the otherwise hideous shopping trap that is M+M world though.

Comment by Rob Mortimer

M&M World? Is that the thing in Leicester Square that pretends to be a cinema but is quite possibly the most ridiculously self inflated and self important retail environment in history?

Comment by Rob

Yes.
I went from being inspired to being outraged and irritable after 10 minutes there.

Comment by Rob Mortimer

“the otherwise hideous shopping trap that is M+M world”

Too true. I still have nightmares about that place. How they can get that many people in a building that doesn’t really do anything I don’t know.

Comment by Sarah

Hello Sarah, thanks for popping by. I didn’t actually go in the place because to be honest – the concept scared me to within an inch of my life – but you’re right, it’s the most pointless venue since Doncaster opened a Royal Box in their local bingo hall.

Comment by Rob

Absolutely. It also seems to be the one place on the UK high street that is bucking the trend that you’ve just written about:

1. There are more staff than you can shake a stick at
2. It’s upsized to the most massive retail space you can imagine
3. But, it doesn’t really sell anything at all

Very puzzling…

Comment by Sarah

Maybe it was an idea created by crowd sourcing – you know, where making actual money never seems to enter their heads.

Ooooh, such a bitch.

Comment by Rob




Leave a Reply