Filed under: Comment
So this is my last post for over a month.
A MONTH!!!
How about that for making your 2013 awesome?
You see next week is Chinese New Year so the entire country shuts down to allow 1.3 billion people to fire off firecrackers from 12:01am [+1 second] till 11:59pm [+ 59 seconds] for 7 whole fucking days straight.
[Given it’s the year of the snake, I’m assuming 2013 will prove to be a fantastic year for bankers, lawyers and 1970’s BBC television presenters]
Then almost immediately after, I go to the other extreme where I take my Mum to North Polesville so she can [hopefully] see the Northern Lights.
How my birkenstocked toes will cope in –50 is anyone’s guess, but we’ll give it a go.
What this means is that I won’t be writing any more rubbish until March 11th … but before you get the celebrations under way, spare a thought for my poor wife who will have to cope with me 24/7 for over 28 days straight.
So as my last post for Feb, I thought I’d talk about something I’ve been seeing more and more of and that’s what I call, irrational assumption.
Irrational assumption is where people assume a person has a lot of additional values/talents/skills simply because of one defining accomplishment.
God, that makes no sense does it.
Does it?
OK, let me give you an example.
In China, you often hear people characterising anyone that has gone to university as Worldly, sophisticated and successful.
Why?
University doesn’t mean you’re Worldly.
Nor does it mean you’re automatically – or even guaranteed to be – successful or sophisticated.
And in China, where the education system is based more around ‘memory’ than ‘application’ [If only for the sheer volume of people it has to cater for] it arguably means it even less.
Not only that, but with so many people now going to university in China, we have started seeing – from a white collar employment perspective – supply outstrip demand.
Please don’t read into this that I’m saying people who go to university in China aren’t smart or capable of achieving great thing – that is, hopefully quite obviously, not the case at all – I’m just saying that it is wrong to assume that because someone achieves one thing, they must also have/embrace/adopt a whole host of other characteristics.
Of course this situation is not exclusive to University graduates or China … I am continually bombarded by shit that is totally irrelevant, just because a company assumed a person of my age and travel commitments must like golf, wine & BMW’s … but the point is, while adland has to – to a certain extent – segment people into groups, if we continue blindly making additional assumptions to their character, interests and achievements simply because of something else they’ve done/achieved, then we’re going to spend even more millions of our clients dollars alienating, rather than attracting.
Given I’m gone for a whole month, if anyone would like to point out any other irrational assumptions, I’d be very interested.
And can we try and avoid the usual cliché on this blog such as:
+ All planners are twits.
+ All Queen fans are stupid.
+ All Birkenstock wearers are lesbians who like German folk music & hairy underarms.
Cool?
Good.
And with that I’m gone.
83 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You lost me when you said you were having a fucking month off.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 8, 2013 @ 6:19 amI thought you had shitloads of holiday before but at least you spread them out over 12 months. In the first 3 months of 2013, you’ll have had 3 holidays. Three! Is be impressed if I wasn’t so jealous and confused.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 8, 2013 @ 6:22 amI know … I know … but if it’s any consolation, I don’t have another holiday till at least June. Ahem.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 8:02 amHere’s my irrational assumption. Dan W is out of his mind.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 8, 2013 @ 6:23 amNew year, old habits eh Rob?
Comment by DH February 8, 2013 @ 6:30 amA month. That’s the longest period between blog posts isn’t it? I wonder if you will be able to last that long in silence? Maybe if your fingers are frozen. 😉
I like the term “irrational assumption”. There is certainly a lot of it in advertising. There’s also a lot in companies. I remember many occasions where a client told me about their customers, only for it to sound more like a dream than a reality.
There are already too many decisions made through the Hollywood lens of reality without us adding our own assumptions. I know time is increasingly the greatest pressure placed on business but all this guessing is undermining effectiveness. The average “audience overview” gives more information about the person writing it than the people it is supposedly about.
I like this post Rob. You’re not saying anything new but you’re saying it which is more than most do.
My irrational assumption is that luxury brands are only bought by the top tiers of society and they’re all educated, wealthy and aspirational.
Have a great (latest) holiday Rob. I hope you and your Mum have a great time.
Comment by Pete February 8, 2013 @ 6:46 amGreat title on this post too.
Comment by Pete February 8, 2013 @ 6:47 amMy irrational assumption is that every comment you make is just one over-my-head-backhanded slap down of the post written..
I mean you were at Cynic.. you gotta be taking the piss with everybody..
Comment by niko February 8, 2013 @ 6:54 amHis niceness ruined it for everyone. We couldn’t be called cynic when he was turning it into charming.
Comment by DH February 8, 2013 @ 7:12 amOnly on this blog could fairness and consideration be viewed as a negative.
Comment by Pete February 8, 2013 @ 7:39 amCynic was named, I believe, because of the guys view on contemporary marketing practices, not their desire to treat people disrespectfully. In fairness to you Niko, I may be wrong on this point.
Comment by Pete February 8, 2013 @ 7:41 amFor clarity Pete, the answer you seek would be dependent on who you asked.
Comment by George February 8, 2013 @ 7:49 amPete.. did you just bitchslap me.. If so.. good..
this is Rob’s last post in while and to leave it on point and subject would be wrong..
Comment by niko February 8, 2013 @ 8:04 amPutting aside the issues of both your character Pete [which is wonderful, I would like to add] and our old company naming strategy [which was definitely the former of your 2 options, at least for me] … your point that many audience definitions says more about the author than the target is a great one.
I remember years ago Andy and I being at Harrods and being told that they literally catered for the top 5% of British society. I also remember Andy asking whether they’d walked through their store recently because he thought it was packed with American tourists who were buying anything just so they could walk out with a Harrods bag. Which sort of fits in with your ‘irrational assumption’ suggestion.
Thanks for the best wishes. Now I know little Bonnie is going to be OK, it’s going to make the whole thing much easier to enjoy.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 8:06 amIrrational assumption: People who look cool are.
Comment by John February 8, 2013 @ 8:05 amI’m safe then.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 8:06 amIrrational assumption: common sense.
Comment by John February 8, 2013 @ 8:06 amOooooh, I like that one. You’re on a roll Mr Dodds.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 8:07 amI foresee my efficiency improving dramatically over the next month. Have a wonderful time with your mother, your trip sounds fascinating. Try and wear some closed shoes.
Comment by Lee Hill February 8, 2013 @ 8:33 amFunnily enough, so do I.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 4:11 pmThis post is a bit like Doublethink in 1984 (did anyone notice George Orwell looks like Dot Cotton’s Dad)
Comment by northern February 8, 2013 @ 5:49 pmOne hand, I’m loving the observation and thinking about another one, folks that assume everyone shares THEIR values, from the Tea Party to brand managers who won’t accept no one gives a monkeys about their new limited edition variant
On the other, I’m seething at the months holiday and fighting not to engage in the ‘it’s not an assumption that Queen fans have something wrong with them, it’s a global inight’ line of disussion.
While all is thrown into disarray at the joy of someone who loves his Mum and much I do and a Mum who loves her kids as much as I do.
By the way, yesterday, when the great news about Bonnie was shared, was the day that my little girl said Daddy properly for the first time.
I wouldn’t read too much into it, this morning Radio Gaga came on the radio and she promptly ignored porridge and stared dancing in her high chair (basically doing the twist sat down). I don’t know how you manipulated the Force to make this happen, but you Jedi mind-powers are truly impressive
Now you know how I ensure Dan doesn’t fire me for holiday overload.
Glad your daughter is keeping you on your toes. Yesterday was a good day for them and an even better day for us.
PS: I will now use the force to make you think of a Queen song of my choice. No? Sorry but I’ve already started so “Don’t Stop Me Now.” Ahem.
Comment by Rob February 8, 2013 @ 6:00 pmMy irrational assumption of the month is that just because you have a fancy prefix, or are a harvard business school dean, it doesn’t mean your right: http://danielbluzerfry.wordpress.com/
Comment by DBF February 10, 2013 @ 7:43 pmProbably not the best puddle to make splashes with, but hey!
Similar to the irrational assumption that being a planner means you’re smarter than a harvard bd dean.
Comment by DH February 10, 2013 @ 8:36 pmhello everyone. i want to say thanks for all your nice words over the last month. its been an ultra shit time for us but its all working out now, thank fuck.
Comment by andy@cynic February 12, 2013 @ 11:13 amthats it. thanks again you soft, lovely bastards. see you sometime when campbell isnt on another 30 day holiday.
‘Like’
Comment by northern February 12, 2013 @ 5:33 pm+1
Comment by Bazza February 12, 2013 @ 7:19 pmx100
+1
Comment by DH February 12, 2013 @ 10:13 pm+1
Comment by niko February 13, 2013 @ 12:21 amIt pleases me immensely to see your swearing grace this blog again Andrew.
Comment by George February 12, 2013 @ 8:45 pm+1
Comment by DH February 12, 2013 @ 10:13 pmBest comment of 2013. Good to hear you Andy.
Comment by DH February 12, 2013 @ 10:16 pmLovely surprise to see your bad language back on here Andy. More evidence things are going well with the little one. Brilliant.
Comment by Rob February 13, 2013 @ 9:46 amGreat to hear you again. You’ve been missed. They’ve been in a planner wanker fenzy without you here. Everything is going to be OK again.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 13, 2013 @ 4:21 amDon’t get me going about planner wanker frenzy, I had to spend half a day this weel listening to folks talk about the semiotics of engine oil
Comment by northern February 14, 2013 @ 5:28 pmDid that go smoothly?
Comment by John February 15, 2013 @ 7:29 amAre you on meds?
Comment by DH February 15, 2013 @ 8:48 amIs engine oil code for crack rocks?
Comment by Billy Whizz February 16, 2013 @ 8:16 pmTumbleweed.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 18, 2013 @ 6:23 amThis blog or your head?
Comment by Rob February 18, 2013 @ 3:55 pmI may well regret saying this, but a day without one of your blog posts to greet me just doesn’t feel quite right. Great seeing you last week, have a wonderful time with your Mum and wrap up well. That includes wearing shoes.
Comment by George February 19, 2013 @ 9:50 pmYou need to get out more George.
Comment by DH February 20, 2013 @ 7:53 amlet’s just all fucking admit it.. we miss trashing Rob.. hence the fact we are lurking around here hoping he will slip up his resolve not to post so we can shoot fish in a barrel like blade runner..
Comment by niko February 20, 2013 @ 9:55 amI’m holding firm. I’m holding firm.
Though I admit, by commenting, I’m showing my resolve isn’t as strong as Chuck Norris after a steroid injection. Or something.
Comment by Rob February 20, 2013 @ 7:00 pmAlso known as being tough as an Italian soldier. (Sorry Mrs C)
Comment by DH February 20, 2013 @ 10:54 pmHe’ll be going outside. He may be some time.
Comment by John February 21, 2013 @ 6:02 am2 weeks and not a post. I’d be happy except it means he’ll be bursting with shit when he gets back.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 23, 2013 @ 1:53 amIs there an echo?
Comment by Billy Whizz February 23, 2013 @ 1:53 amIs there an echo… there an echo…. an echo….. cho… o………
Comment by echo February 26, 2013 @ 11:23 pmhttp://hsmaker.com/harlemshake.asp?url=http%3A%2F%2Frobcampbell.wordpress.com%2F
Look what you making me do to feel like trashing you..
Comment by niko February 28, 2013 @ 2:59 amWhen even Niko succumbs to Harlem Shake ridiculousness, there is little hope the rest of us can maintain our integrity.
Comment by George February 28, 2013 @ 4:23 amyou lost that the moment you commented on this blog. you made it fucking worse on yourself when you commented on this blog even though campbells defeated all expectation and resisted updating in ages. but its ok george, ill still put up with you. youve earnt that.
Comment by andy@cynic February 28, 2013 @ 1:54 pmOne comment and you make this blog worth visiting again.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 28, 2013 @ 4:51 pmLovely to have you insulting me again Andy. Hope all is good … I’ll check in with you soon, whether you like it or not.
Comment by Rob March 3, 2013 @ 9:08 pmLook Rob, stop stalking grannies and gnomes in Asda and bloody post something, It doesn’t have to be good, it just has to be a post.
Comment by northern February 26, 2013 @ 11:46 pmAre you suggesting I do occasionally write something good? Obviously you’re uber-bored if you’re suggesting I write something … but no, I won’t concede, mainly because I’m just about to go into the internet free zone and I know it will please you knowing how much of a sense of loss I’ll feel being disconnected from everything – even if it’s 99% utter rubbish.
Comment by Rob February 27, 2013 @ 12:02 amThis has gone on too long. Write some rubbish Rob, the world is too sensible right now.
Comment by DH February 27, 2013 @ 5:00 amNortherns gone insane.
Comment by Billy Whizz February 27, 2013 @ 7:18 amThat happened a long, long time ago
Comment by northern February 27, 2013 @ 4:17 pmThis will wind him up when he gets back anyway
Comment by northern March 1, 2013 @ 1:33 amhttp://joymachine.typepad.com/northern_planner/2013/02/campbell.html
Don’t know if it’ll wind campbell up, but it’s fucked me up. Planning gay.
Comment by Billy Whizz March 1, 2013 @ 1:43 amTalk about Sophie’s choice. Either putting up with Rob’s posts or having to put up with Northern’s love letter in Rob’s absence. Sickos.
Comment by DH March 1, 2013 @ 2:05 amYou mad fool Northern. I’d better get back soon to stop you making any more career debilitating posts about me.
Comment by Rob March 1, 2013 @ 4:59 pmDon’t worry, my career couldn’t be any worse
Comment by northern March 1, 2013 @ 5:33 pmThat’s a very sweet post you’ve written Northern. It perfectly captures the persona Robert wants everyone to think he has. 😉
Comment by Bazza March 2, 2013 @ 3:56 amI’m temporarily back on line Baz and you are in a teensy bit of trouble. On the positive, I’ve bought 2 more ipad minis for people while on this trip – hope that moves your share price northward.
Comment by Rob March 3, 2013 @ 9:07 pmMine still hasn’t been delivered yet Rob. Did you put the right postage on it?
Comment by DH March 5, 2013 @ 8:14 amTick tock tick tock
Comment by northern March 6, 2013 @ 8:02 pmMonday. You must be a quiver of excitement. You poor man.
Comment by Rob March 6, 2013 @ 8:03 pmThank God for Weigel
Comment by northern March 6, 2013 @ 8:21 pmThat’s what God say’s too.
Comment by Rob March 7, 2013 @ 3:20 pmThat reminds me of that joke about an incident in heaven – Gabriels asks Peter what’s up, Peter says, “We’ve a problem, God’s starting to think he’s Bono”
Comment by northern March 7, 2013 @ 5:47 pmBoom Tish.
Comment by Rob March 7, 2013 @ 6:02 pmAnyway, Weigel’s too serious. There’s more slapstick over here.
Comment by northern March 7, 2013 @ 5:49 pmYou haven’t seen him when he’s had a beer.
Comment by Rob March 7, 2013 @ 6:02 pm‘A’ beer. He’s not a lightweight is he?
Comment by northern March 7, 2013 @ 8:50 pmYou mean like someone who drinks diet coke, ice, no lemon drinker?
Comment by Billy Whizz March 7, 2013 @ 9:59 pmOnly thing that’s light about Rob.
Comment by Billy Whizz March 7, 2013 @ 10:00 pmIt’s Coke Zero these days. Still with ice. Still without lemon … but a whole new level of manliness drink.
And yes, I am writing this comment at 5:18am. Bloody jetlag … I had forgotten this time even existed and I hope I forget about it again very soon.
Comment by Rob March 8, 2013 @ 5:19 amWelcome back Robert. I hope you had a wonderful holiday with your mum. Judging by your instagram updates, it was certainly eventful and memorable. Looking forward to Monday. That is when your posts start again isn’t it?
Comment by George March 8, 2013 @ 7:52 amYes I did and yes it does. God help us all.
Comment by Rob March 8, 2013 @ 9:04 amIs tomorrow the day Robert? I hope so, the days haven’t felt normal for the past month.
Comment by Pete March 10, 2013 @ 8:03 pmYou make that sound like that’s in a bad way. Not possible.
Comment by DH March 11, 2013 @ 1:29 am