I thought I should point this out because following my post about his review of our bastardised-without-us-knowing Walkman ad, he wrote in and pointed out a few things I’d said were inaccurate/misleading – including the photo I’d used of him [which actually wasn’t what the photo was supposed to be representing] which [according to him] “…wasn’t his good side’.
Now if this comment really is from him [though all evidence seems to indicate it is], I have to admit to some new found respect … because not only could he have ignored what I’d written completely, it takes balls the size of the above photo to write a note to someone who is abit pissed off [even though in reality, my anger was more directed at the production company than at his particular comments – afterall, you can only judge what you have been given]
Anyway, if you scroll down to the comments section of the post, you can read his note and my reply.
Maybe it’s a ‘Bob’ thing … maybe it’s because it will upset Andy … maybe it’s because it’s quite scary he actually found and READ my blog … but I quite like this Garfield chappie, so to prove he doesn’t really have a face like an arse or balls [or whatever that photo above actually is] I present to you the real Bob Garfield.
As I said in my reply to him, for a bastard, he’s alright …
